2006
DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movements and Memory: The Making of the Stonewall Myth

Abstract: This article examines why the Stonewall riots became central to gay collective memory while other events did not. It does so through a comparative-historical analysis of Stonewall and four events similar to it that occurred in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York in the 1960s. The Stonewall riots were remembered because they were the first to meet two conditions: activists considered the event commemorable and had the mnemonic capacity to create a commemorative vehicle. That this conjuncture occurred in Ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
185
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
185
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, rather than adopting the instrumentalist or radically presentist approach, many authors today consider its insights, but also examine how the past is non-strategically interpreted from the present perspective and what are factors that constrain or limit malleability of the past (Olick and Robbins 1998;Olick 2003a). In this, they examine the role of the state and non-state memory entrepreneurs (Fine 1996;Armstrong and Crage 2006). …”
Section: Challenging the "Official" Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, rather than adopting the instrumentalist or radically presentist approach, many authors today consider its insights, but also examine how the past is non-strategically interpreted from the present perspective and what are factors that constrain or limit malleability of the past (Olick and Robbins 1998;Olick 2003a). In this, they examine the role of the state and non-state memory entrepreneurs (Fine 1996;Armstrong and Crage 2006). …”
Section: Challenging the "Official" Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, events that are forcefully silenced (in totalitarian societies, for example) may also gather emotional salience that makes them memorable (Pennebaker and Banasik 1997) and they are likely to be institutionalized after silence is broken (Wertsch 2002). The events that are dramatic are also more forceful rhetorically, and thus more commemorable (Schudson 1989a(Schudson , 1992, as exemplified by dramatic nature of the Stonewall riots which also contributed to their institutionalization (Armstrong and Crage 2006). The commemorability of a cultural object may be affected by Griswold's (1987a) "cultural power" -by its ability to evoke diverging interpretations while sustaining an underlying consensus about its meanings.…”
Section: Uses and Malleability Of The Past In Production Of Collectivmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations