1974
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(74)90021-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement variables and the subsequent following response of the domestic chick

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SALZEN 1969;KLOPFER 1971;SLUCKIN 1972). This effect has generally been explained by arguing that movement as such contributes to the conspicuousness of a stimulus, for instance by increasing the contrast with its background (KLOPFER 1965;GOSSOP 1974;EISERER 1980). Moving stimuli were also found to elicit approach and following, which was thought necessary for imprinting to occur (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SALZEN 1969;KLOPFER 1971;SLUCKIN 1972). This effect has generally been explained by arguing that movement as such contributes to the conspicuousness of a stimulus, for instance by increasing the contrast with its background (KLOPFER 1965;GOSSOP 1974;EISERER 1980). Moving stimuli were also found to elicit approach and following, which was thought necessary for imprinting to occur (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%