2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement-Related Sensorimotor High-Gamma Activity Mainly Represents Somatosensory Feedback

Abstract: Somatosensation plays pivotal roles in the everyday motor control of humans. During active movement, there exists a prominent high-gamma (HG >50 Hz) power increase in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and this provides an important feature in relation to the decoding of movement in a brain-machine interface (BMI). However, one concern of BMI researchers is the inflation of the decoding performance due to the activation of somatosensory feedback, which is not elicited in patients who have lost their sensor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of gamma synchronization during the planning phase has been reported in previous studies (Donner et al, 2009;Gaetz et al, 2013;Gunduz et al, 2016;Ryun et al, 2017) and supports the idea that gamma ERS might be associated with top-down mechanisms engaged for movement preparation and, thus, with the creation of an efferent copy of the upcoming movement. Indeed, our task instructions (that is, to perform fast, uncorrected, out-and backmovements to targets appearing in an unpredictable order) mostly engaged feedforward specification of a force-scaling factor according to movement extent (Ghez and Gordon, 1987;Gordon et al, 1994bGordon et al, , 1994a.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The occurrence of gamma synchronization during the planning phase has been reported in previous studies (Donner et al, 2009;Gaetz et al, 2013;Gunduz et al, 2016;Ryun et al, 2017) and supports the idea that gamma ERS might be associated with top-down mechanisms engaged for movement preparation and, thus, with the creation of an efferent copy of the upcoming movement. Indeed, our task instructions (that is, to perform fast, uncorrected, out-and backmovements to targets appearing in an unpredictable order) mostly engaged feedforward specification of a force-scaling factor according to movement extent (Ghez and Gordon, 1987;Gordon et al, 1994bGordon et al, , 1994a.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the existence of early-ERS in HFB posterior to the central sulcus of P2 can be viewed as evidence of S1 activation in top-down movement preparation. There is still controversy as to whether pre-movement activations of S1 truthfully represent the top-down efference copy or merely reflect the somatosensory feedback of subtle muscle contractions before movement onset (Ryun et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, there were modest differences between ECoG channels anterior and posterior to the central sulcus, and the differences changed to some extent depending on the phase of the grasp. In a recent study (Ryun et al, 2017a), it was also discovered that HG activity in S1 was more dominant than in M1 during active, voluntary movement. Others have also confirmed that humans' sensory information is present in M1 recordings, in addition to motor responses in S1 (Schieber and Hibbard, 1993;Sanes et al, 1995;Schroeder et al, 2017).…”
Section: Spatial Profile Of Hfb-ers and Lfb-erdmentioning
confidence: 91%