1994
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/14.5.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement of respiratory CO2 in stems of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings

Abstract: Temperature-independent fluctuations in stem CO(2) efflux were measured in Pinus taeda L. seedlings. Stem CO(2) efflux was measured during high and low transpiration rates, high and low net photosynthesis rates, and normal and interrupted substrate supply conditions. Stem CO(2) efflux rates were an average of 6.7% lower during periods of high transpiration compared to periods of low transpiration. This difference in stem CO(2) efflux rates was not due to water stress. The most likely cause was movement of resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because most transpiration occurs during the day, the stem CO 2 efflux is expected to be lower during the day than at night (Martin et al, 1994;Maier and Clinton, 2006;Teskey et al, 2008;Höltta andKolari, 2009: Gruber et al, 2009;Brito et al, 2010). Alternative explanations include the possibility that (i) the temperatures measured a short distance beneath or at the surface of the bark, as in this study, may not be representative of the temperatures experienced by most of the respiring biomass (Derby and Gates, 1966); (ii) some CO 2 is stored temporarily (Höltta and Kolari, 2009); and (iii) stem respiration depends also on plant water stress (Lavigne, 1987;Teskey et al, 2008;Saveyn et al, 2007), which might be more severe during the day than during the night.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most transpiration occurs during the day, the stem CO 2 efflux is expected to be lower during the day than at night (Martin et al, 1994;Maier and Clinton, 2006;Teskey et al, 2008;Höltta andKolari, 2009: Gruber et al, 2009;Brito et al, 2010). Alternative explanations include the possibility that (i) the temperatures measured a short distance beneath or at the surface of the bark, as in this study, may not be representative of the temperatures experienced by most of the respiring biomass (Derby and Gates, 1966); (ii) some CO 2 is stored temporarily (Höltta and Kolari, 2009); and (iii) stem respiration depends also on plant water stress (Lavigne, 1987;Teskey et al, 2008;Saveyn et al, 2007), which might be more severe during the day than during the night.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al (1994) found temperature-independent fluctuations in stem CO 2 efflux in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings, with flux rates being 6.7 % lower during periods of high transpiration associated with high temperatures, as compared with periods of low transpiration. They could identify transport of respiratory CO 2 in and diffusive loss from the transpiration stream as the most likely cause of this unexpected observation.…”
Section: Bi-directional C Transport Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both rates (R d , R l ) were expressed on a total stem surface area, and the A max was calculated as the absolute value of the difference between R d and R l . It should be noted that the above-named assumptions could be a source of bias, in older and larger trees, where sapwood makes up >80% of the total stem volume, as well as under dry and sunny (field) conditions, when high rates of transpiration (and thus high sap velocities) occur (Martin et al, 1994;McGuire and Teskey, 2002). At high transpiration rates, a portion of the locally respired CO 2 may be carried upward by the transpiration stream instead of released through the bark (Negisi, 1979;Martin et al, 1994;Maier and Clinton, 2006).…”
Section: Temperature Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%