2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement of forest birds across river and clearcut edges of varying riparian buffer strip widths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest specialists are often hesitant to cross boundaries marked by extreme structural contrast, such as the interface between forest and cleared land (Wiens et al. 1985; Norris & Stutchbury 2001; Shirley 2006). A contributing factor might be that forest species have had little reason to traverse clearings in their evolutionary history; therefore the avoidance of such areas might be an innate response (Greenberg 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forest specialists are often hesitant to cross boundaries marked by extreme structural contrast, such as the interface between forest and cleared land (Wiens et al. 1985; Norris & Stutchbury 2001; Shirley 2006). A contributing factor might be that forest species have had little reason to traverse clearings in their evolutionary history; therefore the avoidance of such areas might be an innate response (Greenberg 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relatively few studies have empirically examined how individual movement pathways are influenced by landscape structure (Desrochers & Hannon 1997; Robichaud et al. 2002; Shirley 2006). Mark‐recapture, radiotelemetry and translocation studies provide critical information on long‐distance movements and have established that movement might be disrupted by habitat fragmentation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human transformation of land cover and land use are the primary causes of biodiversity loss (Haines-Young 2009). As a consequence, continuous habitats are being divided into discontinuous patches, which affects population recruitment (Robinson et al 1995;Smith & Hellmann 2002), survival (Harris 1984) and movement (Shirley 2006;Tucker et al 2018) of terrestrial animal species (Suárez-Seoane et al 2008;Tucker et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Forest interior bulbuls such as these would be expected to forage within their small home ranges and thus are likely to disperse seeds over relatively short distances compared with non‐territorial or larger bodied species (Shirley , Dennis & Westcott ). In this case, with an average home range of only 2.2 ha that is roughly circular in shape, maximum dispersal distance would be expected to be less than 170 m. We discuss below evidence relating to the four predictions made in the Introduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%