2013
DOI: 10.18357/jcs.v38i1.15438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement and Clay

Abstract: Our program, like many other early childhood programs, is an environment of emergent and playbased programming for twenty-five 3-and 4-year-old children. In September 2011 we decided to introduce clay into our program. We had been moving toward presenting materials in our space that are open ended, rather than fixed or prescribed in meaning, and that allow for change. Materials that inspire imagination, creativity, and exploration. It was hoped that the introduction of clay would extend on and allow for a crea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensions that emerged for me, as well as many of the other educators, in our early inquiries raised many questions about who and what we attend to (care for) in our practices: children's development, children's safety, parents' wishes, the materials, the spaces, educators' desires and concerns, the legacy of colonization, our environmental impact. (For more on some of these questions that have emerged in our collective research inquiries, see Clark & Nelson, 2014;Clark, Pacini-Ketchabaw, & Hodgins, 2014;Elliott & Yazbeck, 2013;Hodgins & Foreland, 2013;Yazbeck, 2013. ) We have not smoothed out these tensions, and our questions have not brought about easy (any?)…”
Section: Beginningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensions that emerged for me, as well as many of the other educators, in our early inquiries raised many questions about who and what we attend to (care for) in our practices: children's development, children's safety, parents' wishes, the materials, the spaces, educators' desires and concerns, the legacy of colonization, our environmental impact. (For more on some of these questions that have emerged in our collective research inquiries, see Clark & Nelson, 2014;Clark, Pacini-Ketchabaw, & Hodgins, 2014;Elliott & Yazbeck, 2013;Hodgins & Foreland, 2013;Yazbeck, 2013. ) We have not smoothed out these tensions, and our questions have not brought about easy (any?)…”
Section: Beginningsmentioning
confidence: 99%