Move It or Lose It? The Effect of Early Active Movement on Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Silveira, Anelise; Luk, Joel; Tan, Maria; Kang, Sung Hyun; Sheps, David M; Bouliane, Martin; Beaupré, Lauren A

doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9634

Cited by 4 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 68 SRs were analysed (43 with meta‐analysis; 25 without). Fifty‐seven SRs (83.8%) were registered 79–110 . Refs 8,95,97,112–133 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fifteen SRs (22.1%) were available open access 86,88,90,93,98,101,104,114,115,119,128,133–136 . A statement that PRISMA or similar reporting guidelines had been followed were present in 61 (89.7%) of the published studies 79,81–100,103–109,112,116,118,124,134,137–140 . Refs 8,113–115,117,119–122,125–128,130–133,135,136,141–144 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All but one 84 of the 57 registered studies had the review question stated in the associated registration. The review question matched the registration in 29 of 57 studies (50.9%) 79,81,85,87,88,91–94,98,100,101,104,105,107,110,112–114,116,118–120,124,126,129,130,132,143 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For registered MAs ( n = 36), the review question in the study matched the associated registration in 16 (44.4%) cases 79,81,85,87,88,91,94,101,104,107,114,120,124,126,129,132 . The primary outcome matched the registration in eight of the MAs (22.2%) 79,89,94,103,107,125,127,131 . The statistical analysis plan was present in the registration and was the same in the publication for 27 cases (75.0%) 79,81,84,85,89,91,94–96,99,101–104,107,109,114,117,120,125,126,128,129,131–133,142 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

McClenahan

Lojacono

Young

et al. 2023

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RationaleThe physiotherapy profession strives to be a leader in providing quality care and strongly recognizes the value of research to guide clinical practice. Adherence to guidelines for research reporting and conduct is a significant step towards high‐quality, transparent and reproducible research.Aim/ObjectiveAssess integrity between planned and conducted methodology in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) published in physiotherapy journals.MethodsEighteen journals were manually searched for RCTs and SRs published from 1 July 2021 through 31 December 2021. Studies were included if the journal or specific study was indexed in PubMed and published/translated in English. Descriptive statistics determined congruence between preregistration data and publication.ResultsForty RCTs and 68 SRs were assessed. Forty‐three SRs included meta‐analysis (MA). Of the 34 registered RCTs, 7 (20.6%) had no discrepancy between the registration and publication. Two trials (5.9%) addressed all discrepancies, 4 (11.8%) addressed some and 21 (61.8%) did not address any discrepancies. Of the 36 registered MAs, 33 (91.7%) had discrepancies between the registration and publication. Two (5.6%) addressed all discrepancies and three (8.3%) had no discrepancies. Eight SRs without MA published information not matching their registration, and none provided justification for the discrepancies.ConclusionMost RCTs/SRs were registered; the majority had discrepancies between preregistration and publication, potentially influencing the outcomes and interpretations of findings. Journals should require preregistration and compare the submission with the registration information when assessing publication suitability. Readers should be aware of these inconsistencies and their implications when interpreting and translating results into practice.

show abstract

“…A total of 68 SRs were analysed (43 with meta‐analysis; 25 without). Fifty‐seven SRs (83.8%) were registered 79–110 . Refs 8,95,97,112–133 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

McClenahan

Lojacono

Young

et al. 2023

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Does timing influence rehabilitation outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting? a prospective randomized study

Rhee,

Kim,

Lee

et al. 2024

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Early Versus Traditional Rehabilitation Protocol after Rotator Cuff Repair: An Umbrella-Review

Paolucci,

Agostini,

Conti

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair is crucial for functional recovery and for minimizing the risk of retear. There are two rehabilitation protocols (early and traditional) and the debate about which is the best is still open. This umbrella review aimed to compare the effect of these rehabilitation protocols in terms of reduction of pain, functional recovery and retear risk. We selected systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 2012 to 2022 dealing with the aim. Nineteen systematic reviews were included. No significant differences were found between early and traditional protocols in terms of pain reduction. Early rehabilitation provided better short-term results regarding Range of Motion improvement, but long-term functional outcomes were similar. Retear risk remains a significant concern for the early protocol. We found major differences between the analyzed protocols. This review suggests that both protocols are useful to recover global shoulder function, but the standard protocol has a greater safety profile for larger tears. On the other hand, the early protocol may be preferable for smaller lesions, allowing a faster recovery and having less impact on medical costs. Further research is needed to identify optimal rehabilitation strategies tailored to the individual patient's needs and characteristics.

show abstract

Move It or Lose It? The Effect of Early Active Movement on Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 22 publications

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

Does timing influence rehabilitation outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting? a prospective randomized study

Comparison of Early Versus Traditional Rehabilitation Protocol after Rotator Cuff Repair: An Umbrella-Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About