1997
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/90.2.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouthpart Structure, Feeding Mechanisms, and Natural Food Sources of Adult Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract: Mouthpart structure, feeding mechanisms and natural sources of food of the adults of four species of Bactrocera fruit flies (Tephritidae: Diptera) endemic to Queensland, viz. Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt), Bactrocera jarvisi (Tryon), Bactrocera cacuminata (Hering) and Bactrocera cucumis (French), were stnjdied. When exposed to dry food, adults always regurgitated fluid from their crop to liquefy and dissolve the food substrate. Regurgitated liquids and dissolved food were then reingested but only through fine m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in figure 4d, the expelled fluids make it possible to connect the liquid inside the small substrate pores to the liquid bridge inside the food canals via a capillary conduit. Our observations supplement previous findings that flies and butterflies expel fluids while feeding on dry or porous surfaces [13,35,36]. For unfed insects, the measured limiting pore sizes are approximately equal to the distal mouthpart diameters and show little dependence on the proximal dimensions ( figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in figure 4d, the expelled fluids make it possible to connect the liquid inside the small substrate pores to the liquid bridge inside the food canals via a capillary conduit. Our observations supplement previous findings that flies and butterflies expel fluids while feeding on dry or porous surfaces [13,35,36]. For unfed insects, the measured limiting pore sizes are approximately equal to the distal mouthpart diameters and show little dependence on the proximal dimensions ( figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Their ability to feed on a wide variety of fluids, such as nectar, blood, sap flows, honeydew and juices on carrion, rotting fruit and dung [6][7][8][9][10], probably contributed to their massive radiation by providing opportunities to enter new adaptive zones [11]. Both groups have mouthparts (proboscises) that are conceptually a conduit with modified distal parts that support fluid uptake [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elzinga & Broce, 1986;Vijaysegaran et al, 1997), and it is clear that the various components are very variable, even amongst the Muscomorpha (Elzinga & Broce, 1986). Elzinga & Broce, 1986;Vijaysegaran et al, 1997), and it is clear that the various components are very variable, even amongst the Muscomorpha (Elzinga & Broce, 1986).…”
Section: Mouthpart Structure In D;pteramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its basic mode, the proboscis is used to mop up and/or suck up liquids (Graham-Smith, 1930;Vijaysegaran et aL, 1997), either as liquid food (nectar, honeydew), or as solid material dissolved/suspended in salivary secretions. Studies of the functioning of dipteran mouthparts are relatively rare in the literature (Graham-Smith, 1930;Schiemenz, 1957;Schuhmacher & H o h a n , 1982;Vijaysegaran et al, 1997) and there have been many wild guesses as to how the various parts operate, especially in feeding from flowers or on honeydew.…”
Section: Mouthpart Structure In D;pteramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hendrichs (2000) notes, the importance of natural food sources, including bacteria, on male reproductive success and Þeld performance remains an aspect of fruit ßy behavioral ecology that is poorly understood. Tephritid ßies harbor microorganisms in their alimentary canal, and the presence of ectocellular enteric bacteria has been documented for a range of species in this family (Rossiter et al 1983, Howard et al 1985, Drew and Lloyd 1989, Howard 1989, Daser and Brandl 1992, Vijasegaran et al 1997. These symbiotic microorganisms are harbored in the esophageal bulb, crop, and midgut caeca of fruit ßies (Douglas and Beard 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%