2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse versus Human Neutrophils in Cancer: A Major Knowledge Gap

Abstract: Many types of cancer recruit neutrophils that could have pro- or anti-tumor effects on tumor development. Numerous findings in murine models suggest a predominantly pro-tumoral role for neutrophils in cancer development. However, there are fundamental differences between mouse versus human tumors in the evolution of tumors, genetic diversity, immune response, and also in the intrinsic biology of neutrophils that might have a profound impact on tumor development and the function of these cells. A crucial differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
99
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review, Eruslanov et al . nicely summarized the current knowledge on neutrophils in human cancer as compared to animal models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review, Eruslanov et al . nicely summarized the current knowledge on neutrophils in human cancer as compared to animal models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Trojan Horse mode of transmission is recognized, the associative processes involved in regulating the actual transfer are not clear. There are several reports about the unusual behavior of PMNs in mice during Leishmania infections (11); however, intrinsic differences in the biology of human and mouse neutrophils (12) restrict the extrapolation of the observations into the human system. Therefore, the absence of a proper animal model and the lack of human neutrophil cell lines makes research in this area more challenging and interesting from the point of view of revealing novel events during host-pathogen interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice are frequently the model species of choice for in vivo preclinical research, due to their relatively small size and short lifespans, and the large number of strains and large body of literature available. Nevertheless, mouse and other in vivo preclinical models differ from humans in many known and unknown details, both intrinsic (eg, genetic, immune, [159][160][161][162][163][164] surface area: volume ratio, lifespan 165 ) and extrinsic (eg, captivity, diet, history), which, depending on the research question, may substantially affect translational relevance. 166 It is critical to remember that each distinct inbred strain may respond differently to an intervention 126,167 that the same strain supplied by a different vendor (or with different gut microbiota) may respond differently, 168 and that sex differences in response may appear only in specific species or strains.…”
Section: Selection Of a Mouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%