2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00322-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse strains differ under a simple schedule of operant learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the 2-CSSRT, a modified version of the 5-CSSRT (Bevins and Besheer, 2006), to measure attention performance. This task has been described previously and has been successfully used to analyze sustained attention in mice (Baron and Meltzer, 2001;Lee et al, 2002). It provides not only indices of attention (accuracy) but also those of executive control over performance such as premature (an index of impulsivity) and perseverative responding (compulsive behavior).…”
Section: Loss Of Ngf-trka Signaling Does Not Impair Attention Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the 2-CSSRT, a modified version of the 5-CSSRT (Bevins and Besheer, 2006), to measure attention performance. This task has been described previously and has been successfully used to analyze sustained attention in mice (Baron and Meltzer, 2001;Lee et al, 2002). It provides not only indices of attention (accuracy) but also those of executive control over performance such as premature (an index of impulsivity) and perseverative responding (compulsive behavior).…”
Section: Loss Of Ngf-trka Signaling Does Not Impair Attention Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of operant methods with positive reinforcement contingencies has been relatively neglected in mouse behavioral genetics and neuroscience (Mihalick, Langlois, Krienke, & Dube, 2000). One factor hindering the widespread adoption of these methods is the presumed difficulty of establishing such behavior (Baron & Meltzer, 2001; see, e.g., Crawley, 2000, pp. 114-119).…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the present study was to establish operant lever pressing (as distinct from nose poking) in mice using a modified version of the automated procedure described by Baron and Meltzer (2001). To our knowledge, there have been no published reports demonstrating that operant lever pressing can be established in various types of inbred mice within two 120-min training sessions.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
These results are not totally conclusive because the strains in question also show a number of behavioral peculiarities that are unrelated to the effects of an absent CC [2,18,20,26], and it remains possible that effects of absent CC may depend on the strain background, just as CC absence does [22]. The present paper addresses this limitation by utilizing several recombinant inbred lines created from the 129 and BALB/c strains, so that genes responsible for absence of the CC would not likely be spuriously correlated with genes relevant for abnormal behavior.

The literature on humans lacking the CC points to mild, language-related deficits in intelligence and rhyming [10,24], and it suggests that deficits are most likely to appear on motor tasks, in which pressure exists to perform at high speed [14,23].

…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%