2007
DOI: 10.1002/mc.20294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse skin chemical carcinogenesis is inhibited by antizyme in promotion‐sensitive and promotion‐resistant genetic backgrounds

Abstract: Elevated polyamine content and increased ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity have been associated with neoplastic growth in numerous animal models and human tissues. Antizyme (AZ) is a negative regulator of polyamine metabolism that inhibits ODC activity, stimulates ODC degradation, and suppresses polyamine uptake. Preliminary evidence, obtained from transgenic mice with tissue specific overexpression of AZ indicates that tumor development can be suppressed by AZ. To extend these studies, we have examined t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Odc heterozygosity did not influence induction of neuroblastomas by N-Myc (94), lymphoma development in response to an activated c-Myc was markedly delayed in Odc (+/−) transgenic mice (67), and substantially fewer skin papillomas developed in these mice when subjected to a two stage carcinogenesis protocol (141). Similarly, transgenic expression of AZ, producing a moderate reduction of ODC, blocked skin carcinogenesis in response to two stage carcinogenesis protocols (142), UV radiation (143), or overexpression of the MEK oncogene (144) and reduced tumor incidence in both N -nitrosomethylbenzylamine-induced forestomach tumor (145) and nitroquinoline- N -oxide-induced esophageal tumor models (145)(D. J. Feith, unpublished observations). These experiments provide a reasonable explanation for the remarkable efficacy of low doses of the ODC inhibitor DFMO in a recent human chemoprevention trial.…”
Section: Polyamines and Heritable Human Diseasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although Odc heterozygosity did not influence induction of neuroblastomas by N-Myc (94), lymphoma development in response to an activated c-Myc was markedly delayed in Odc (+/−) transgenic mice (67), and substantially fewer skin papillomas developed in these mice when subjected to a two stage carcinogenesis protocol (141). Similarly, transgenic expression of AZ, producing a moderate reduction of ODC, blocked skin carcinogenesis in response to two stage carcinogenesis protocols (142), UV radiation (143), or overexpression of the MEK oncogene (144) and reduced tumor incidence in both N -nitrosomethylbenzylamine-induced forestomach tumor (145) and nitroquinoline- N -oxide-induced esophageal tumor models (145)(D. J. Feith, unpublished observations). These experiments provide a reasonable explanation for the remarkable efficacy of low doses of the ODC inhibitor DFMO in a recent human chemoprevention trial.…”
Section: Polyamines and Heritable Human Diseasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, mice from C57BL/6 background have previously been reported to be more resistant to tumor development and particularly to skin carcinogenesis, in contrast to mice having a DBA/2 genetic background which present a higher rate of tumors formation when subjected to the same protocol [41]. However, this resistance of benign tumors to progress to malignant lesions provided us with the opportunity to study the effect of high endogenous levels of TRAIL in skin on the early step of the skin tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the transgene was detected with a sense primer (5′-TTCGGCTTCTGGCGTGTGAC-3′) that binds in the β-actin promoter region and an antisense primer (5′-CTTACTGCGGAAGACGAGG-3′) that binds in the human SpdS coding region to amplify a 330 bp product. A second primer pair that yields a 520 bp product from the mouse antizyme 1 gene ( Oaz1 ) was also included in the reaction, which provides a positive control for successful PCR amplification for each genomic DNA sample (Feith et al 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%