2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in preclinical drug development

Abstract: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the Western world. NAFLD is a complex spectrum of liver diseases ranging from benign hepatic steatosis to its more aggressive necroinflammatory manifestation, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH pathogenesis is multifactorial and risk factors are almost identical to those of the metabolic syndrome. This has prompted substantial efforts to identify novel drug therapies for correcting underlying metabolic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
186
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
9
186
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our opinion is that any significant progress in these fronts depends on the availability of mouse models that closely mimic human NASH. Since mouse models of NASH have been recently reviewed (Haczeyni et al, 2018; Hansen et al, 2017; Takakura et al, 2018), we focus the following discussion on preclinical models for studying NASH-driven HCC, the most dangerous outcome of untreated NASH. In addition to replicating the human pathology and showing robust progression to HCC within a reasonable timeframe (less than 12 months) and without the use of chemical carcinogens, a suitable preclinical model of NASH-driven HCC should also be responsive to the only effective HCC treatment identified thus far, inhibitors of the PD-L1:PD-1 checkpoint (El-Khoueiry et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our opinion is that any significant progress in these fronts depends on the availability of mouse models that closely mimic human NASH. Since mouse models of NASH have been recently reviewed (Haczeyni et al, 2018; Hansen et al, 2017; Takakura et al, 2018), we focus the following discussion on preclinical models for studying NASH-driven HCC, the most dangerous outcome of untreated NASH. In addition to replicating the human pathology and showing robust progression to HCC within a reasonable timeframe (less than 12 months) and without the use of chemical carcinogens, a suitable preclinical model of NASH-driven HCC should also be responsive to the only effective HCC treatment identified thus far, inhibitors of the PD-L1:PD-1 checkpoint (El-Khoueiry et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASH is now the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States and predisposes to HCC (2), the most common malignancy of liver worldwide (3). Currently, there are no FDA-approved treatments for NASH, which could be a reflection of the lack of faithful animal models that fully recapitulate its clinical presentation (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASH pathogenesis is complex and multi-factorial, though the risk factors are nearly identical to those predisposing to the metabolic syndrome (4). It was revealed nearly two decades ago that NAFLD is significantly associated with insulin resistance (IR) (6), and NAFLD-associated hepatic IR is independent of adiposity and glucose intolerance (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal models of NASH can be roughly categorized into those caused by genetic mutation and those with an acquired phenotype induced via dietary manipulation. Genetic leptin‐deficient (ob/ob), leptin‐resistant (db/db), or Agouti mutation (KK/A y ) mice, and methionine/choline‐deficient (MCD) diet, CDAA diet‐, or high‐fat diet‐fed models (Anstee & Goldin, ; Ibrahim, Hirsova, Malhi, & Gores, ; Nakamura & Terauchi, ) are examples of animal models of NASH that have been used to examine a number of traditional and novel agents to date (Hansen et al, ). We previously examined the effects of ipragliflozin on NAFLD and NASH using CDAA diet‐fed rats, KK/A y , high‐fat diet‐fed streptozotocin–nicotinamide‐induced type 2 diabetic mice (Hayashizaki‐Someya et al, ; Tahara et al, ; Tahara, Takasu, Yokono, Imamura, & Kurosaki, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%