2008
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgn267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse models for the study of colon carcinogenesis

Abstract: The study of experimental colon carcinogenesis in rodents has a long history, dating back almost 80 years. There are many advantages to studying the pathogenesis of carcinogen-induced colon cancer in mouse models, including rapid and reproducible tumor induction and the recapitulation of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence that occurs in humans. The availability of recombinant inbred mouse panels and the existence of transgenic, knock-out and knock-in genetic models further increase the value of these studies. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
343
2
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
13
343
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the hCYP1A mice, PhIP/DSS treatments caused rapid destruction of colon mucosa with severe inflammation, followed by the appearance of reactive hyperplastic and low-grade dysplastic crypts, and then manifestation of high-grade dysplastic lesions, adenomas, and finally adenocarcinomas ( Figure 2A). These histopathologic features are very similar to those found in the murine AOM/DSS-induced models (Rosenberg et al, 2009;) and resemble human colon carcinogenesis, which is believed to progress from indefinite dysplasia to low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia to carcinoma (Boivin et al, 2003;De Lerma Barbaro et al, 2014;Itzkowitz et al, 2004). However, only one out of thirteen (7.7%) PhIP/DSSinduced adenocarcinomas showed evidence of submucosal invasion at week 10.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the hCYP1A mice, PhIP/DSS treatments caused rapid destruction of colon mucosa with severe inflammation, followed by the appearance of reactive hyperplastic and low-grade dysplastic crypts, and then manifestation of high-grade dysplastic lesions, adenomas, and finally adenocarcinomas ( Figure 2A). These histopathologic features are very similar to those found in the murine AOM/DSS-induced models (Rosenberg et al, 2009;) and resemble human colon carcinogenesis, which is believed to progress from indefinite dysplasia to low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia to carcinoma (Boivin et al, 2003;De Lerma Barbaro et al, 2014;Itzkowitz et al, 2004). However, only one out of thirteen (7.7%) PhIP/DSSinduced adenocarcinomas showed evidence of submucosal invasion at week 10.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the past decades, dozens of experimental rodent models have been developed to investigate the pathogenesis of CRC (De Robertis et al, 2011;Rosenberg et al, 2009). However, the most popular and widely studied of these models employed genetic manipulation (eg, Apc min mutants) or synthetic chemicals, such as azoxymethane (AOM) and/or dextran sodium sulfate (DSS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no in vivo model of CRC has demonstrated predictable and reproducible distant metastatic outgrowth within relevant target organs from an orthotopically-established primary colorectal tumour [2][3][4][5] . The lack of available models has precluded investigations into the route(s) of metastatic spread to distant organs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations into CRC metastatic routes, however, have been precluded by the lack of availability of relevant in vivo metastatic models of CRC. Indeed, despite the wide availability of xenograft, chemical-induced and genetically-engineered mouse models of CRC [2][3][4][5] , tumours in these models fail to reproducibly metastasize to the regional intestinal lymph nodes and liver-the target organs relevant to human CRC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AOM metabolized in the liver to methylazoxymethanol (MAM) by phase I detoxification enzymes such as CYP2E1. MAM then readily yields the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite, high reactive methyldiazonium ions for the methylation of DNA (Rosenberg et al, 2009). Thereafter, phase II detoxification enzymes conjugate and guide these ions from the body (Sunkara et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%