2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13100-019-0157-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse germ line mutations due to retrotransposon insertions

Abstract: Transposable element (TE) insertions are responsible for a significant fraction of spontaneous germ line mutations reported in inbred mouse strains. This major contribution of TEs to the mutational landscape in mouse contrasts with the situation in human, where their relative contribution as germ line insertional mutagens is much lower. In this focussed review, we provide comprehensive lists of TE-induced mouse mutations, discuss the different TE types involved in these insertional mutations and elaborate on p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 288 publications
(308 reference statements)
5
84
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is remarkable that no active DNA transposons have been identified in humans and mice [37] nor in the vast majority of mammals, with the exception of some bat species [38][39][40][41], thus limiting the possibility to investigate in these species the short-term effect of insertions mediated by this group of TEs. D. melanogaster as well as other Drosophila species, are therefore promising model organisms for studying the contribution to regulatory sequences by eukaryotic TEs.…”
Section: Drosophila Tes: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is remarkable that no active DNA transposons have been identified in humans and mice [37] nor in the vast majority of mammals, with the exception of some bat species [38][39][40][41], thus limiting the possibility to investigate in these species the short-term effect of insertions mediated by this group of TEs. D. melanogaster as well as other Drosophila species, are therefore promising model organisms for studying the contribution to regulatory sequences by eukaryotic TEs.…”
Section: Drosophila Tes: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subclass contains a 1.9 kb deletion affecting gag and pol, creating a gag-pol fusion gene and protein which facilitates its own retrotransposition (Saito et al 2008). Notably, nearly all recent activity of the IAP family, as judged by germ line mutations due to IAP insertions, involve 1Δ1 elements (Gagnier et al 2019). The degree of similarity between the identities of the current Cdk5rap1-IAP and Stab2-IAP suggests that a burst of IAP insertions took place in parental genome and the two IAPs were fixed differentially during the establishment of individual inbred strains in early 1900s, rather than that the transpositions occurred and fixed independently in C57BL/6J line and in DBA line (Beck et al 2000).…”
Section: Insertion Of An Iap Element Within the Promoter Region Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the IAP is in an opposite transcriptional orientation relative to that of Stab2 DBA , an antisense promoter within the 5′LTR can initiate reverse-oriented transcription and cause disturbance of the normal transcription of nearby genes (Chuong et al 2017;Gagnier et al 2019;Thompson et al 2016). To confirm that the Stab2 DBA transcription is driven by the 5′LTR in vivo, we performed reverse transcription PCR using RNA from tissues using a forward primer corresponding to a sequence within the 5′LTR and a reverse primer corresponding to a sequence in the Stab2 exon 3 (Fig.…”
Section: ′Ltr Of the Stab2-iap Drives The Stab2 Dba Gene Expression mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ERVs potentially compromise genomic integrity by disrupting gene structure and expression, and by triggering chromosome rearrangements 7 . In laboratory mice, roughly 12% of all pathological mutations result from ERV integration events, half of which emanate from a single family of the ERVK class, the Intracisternal A particles (IAP), that comprise ∼2800 full-length copies 8 . In contrast, human-specific ERVs are mostly transposition-defective 8 .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%