2011
DOI: 10.1598/jaal.54.7.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mountains and Pit Bulls: Students' Metaphors for College Transitional Reading and Writing

Abstract: In this article, we describe an approach to uncovering learners' literacy‐oriented conceptualizations while they are enrolled in transitional, or developmental, reading and writing classes in a college context. This approach entailed eliciting and then analyzing the metaphors for academic literacies produced by students in 15 sections of a mandatory paired reading and writing course. We examine major themes that emerged from our analysis en route to promoting and discussing the utility of short stem prompts as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
4
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the metaphorical linguistic expressions that were found resulted in the categorisation of conceptual metaphors that included: TEXT and KNOWLEDGE AS COMMODITY (in metaphor analysis literature, conceptual metaphors are traditionally depicted in SMALL CAPS). Such variety within educational venues has been documented by previous metaphor analysis research (Cortazzi and Jin 1999;de Guerrero and Villamil 2002) and specifically in college developmental reading and writing contexts (Armstrong 2007;Paulson and Armstrong 2011). The current study, however, is not focused on variety, but rather on salient and potentially important elements of the conceptualisations of 'text' and 'language' found in the collected data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Analysis of the metaphorical linguistic expressions that were found resulted in the categorisation of conceptual metaphors that included: TEXT and KNOWLEDGE AS COMMODITY (in metaphor analysis literature, conceptual metaphors are traditionally depicted in SMALL CAPS). Such variety within educational venues has been documented by previous metaphor analysis research (Cortazzi and Jin 1999;de Guerrero and Villamil 2002) and specifically in college developmental reading and writing contexts (Armstrong 2007;Paulson and Armstrong 2011). The current study, however, is not focused on variety, but rather on salient and potentially important elements of the conceptualisations of 'text' and 'language' found in the collected data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, we understood academic literacy as a social practice “through which identities and social relations organized around tertiary learning are produced and negotiated” (Saltmarsh & Saltmarsh, , p. 622). This approach allowed us to consider the experiences and views of first‐year college students (Paulson & Armstrong, ) in light of official and institutional views of college readiness and college‐level reading (Springer, Wilson, & Dole, ).…”
Section: The Academic Literacies Of Latina/o College Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metaphor empowered the learners to reflect on their academic progress and achievement of learning goals. Paulson and Armstrong (2011) solicited self-created metaphors from 128 college students enrolled in developmental literacy courses. They discovered more students viewed literacy as a product than as a process and there were 2.49 nonnegative metaphors for each negative metaphor.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Education 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The more lenses through which individuals are able to see the world, the more flexible, and ultimately capable, they can be in responding to and discussing it with others" (Tracey & Morrow, 2012, p. xi). Third, by soliciting adult students' metaphors, we may see how their perspectives interact with dominant concepts in their literacy program and how educators can move them forward in their literacy learning (Paulson & Armstrong, 2011).…”
Section: Theories and Models Literacy Metaphors Literacy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%