2016
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1243038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mountainous Terrain and Civil Wars: Geospatial Analysis of Conflict Dynamics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This smoothing parameter is similar to a spatially lagged dependent variable estimate and approximates the influence of location upon the outcome of interest (see Wood 2004, 684). GAM spatial smoothing terms have been used in existing spatial analysis of geographically disaggregated violent events data (e.g., Linke et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This smoothing parameter is similar to a spatially lagged dependent variable estimate and approximates the influence of location upon the outcome of interest (see Wood 2004, 684). GAM spatial smoothing terms have been used in existing spatial analysis of geographically disaggregated violent events data (e.g., Linke et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disaggregation of conflicts into their constituent events can occur in a number of ways. Spatial disaggregation, whereby events might be mapped to their specific locations (Donnay, 2014;Linke et al, 2016), or to within areas where those events occur (Braithwaite and Johnson, 2015), enables the investigation of the geographic distribution of conflict events, highlighting areas that are more at risk. Temporal disaggregation, whereby the precise timings of events are analyzed, can be used to identify trends in the intensity of the conflict.…”
Section: Disaggregating Political Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each observation corresponds to a grid cell specified by a certain square kilometer. As grid cells are typically created in a smaller size than the entire territory of the average country, grid data allow researchers to focus on the local relationship between a causal factor and an outcome (for examples of applied research, see Buhaug et al 2011;Linke et al 2017;O'Loughlin and Witmer 2012;Ruggeri, Dorussen, and Gizelis 2017;Schutte and Weidmann 2011;Theisen, Holtermann, and Buhaug 2011;Wood and Sullivan 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to develop a theory of exactly how each of the three sources of uncertainty specific to grid data affects inference. While the existing literature sometimes explores empirically how changing the size of grid cells affects statistical inference (e.g., Ito and Hinkkainen Elliott 2020;Lee, Rogers, and Soifer 2020;Linke et al 2017;Schutte and Weidmann 2011), this article provides a theoretical foundation on why it is necessary to use different grid cell specifications for robustness checks. A specific choice of grid cell specification affects statistical and causal inference (Soifer 2019, 95).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%