1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(81)90008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moulting and growth in serolid isopods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, GP in benthic invertebrates seems to be independent of body mass, whereas annual gonad production is positively related to body mass, indicating that a n increase in gonad output may be one of the evolutionary advantages of larger body size. Kemp et al (1985) Rhepoxynius abronius Crustacea 0.0062 283.5 0.361 Luxmoore (1981Luxmoore ( , 1982Luxmoore ( . 1985 As indicated by Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, GP in benthic invertebrates seems to be independent of body mass, whereas annual gonad production is positively related to body mass, indicating that a n increase in gonad output may be one of the evolutionary advantages of larger body size. Kemp et al (1985) Rhepoxynius abronius Crustacea 0.0062 283.5 0.361 Luxmoore (1981Luxmoore ( , 1982Luxmoore ( . 1985 As indicated by Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although giants occur in most habitats, they are more common at the poles. In isopods of the cosmopolitan genus Serolis, maximum body size increased with latitude and no small-bodied species occurred in the Southern Ocean (Fig.4) (Luxmoore, 1982).…”
Section: Who Are the Giants?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar gigantism has been reported among many taxa of marine organisms, including copepods (Hop et al, 2006), pteropod molluscs (Weslawski et al, 2009), cephalopod molluscs (Rosa andSiebel, 2010), ctenophores (Barnes, 2005) (Fig.1), chaetognaths (MacLaren, 1966), foraminiferans (Mikhalevich, 2004), amphipod crustaceans (DeBroyer, 1977), isopod crustaceans (Menzies and George, 1968;Luxmoore, 1982), sponges ( Fig.2) (Dayton and Robillard, 1971), polychaete annelids (Hartman, 1964), echinoderms (Dahm, 1996) and pycnogonids (sea spiders; Fig.3) (Child, 1995). Polar gigantism has also been reported from the fossil record [trilobites (Gutiérrez-Marco et al, 2009)].…”
Section: Who Are the Giants?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important studies of small species have included those of the prosobranch Laevilacunaria antarctica [Picken, 1979], and the two philobryid bivalves Lissarca miliaris [Richardson, 1979] and Lissarca notorcadensis [Brey and Hain , 1992]. [Clarke and Laklwni, 1979], the philobryid bivalve Lissarca miliaris [Richardson, 1979], the prosohranch Laevilacunaria antarctica [Picken, 1979] and seroM iS0podS [Luxmoore, 1982].…”
Section: Growth Ratementioning
confidence: 99%