1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01418522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor versus somatosensory evoked potential changes after acute experimental spinal cord injury in rats

Abstract: In this study, averaged cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) after sciatic nerve stimulation, and lower extremity muscle responses after motor cortex stimulation (MEP) were compared in rats. 10 animals served as light (25 g-cm) and 10 animals as severe (80 g-cm) acute spinal cord injury group after weight dropping trauma. After the initial loss of components, both SEP and MEP recovered in most cases in the light injury group. In the severe injury group, however, no recovery was observed in cortical S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,12 Moreover, variability in MEP amplitudes has also been dramatic within studies. 7,9,11,12 In a previous study we have found that controlling the depth of anesthesia will reduce the variability in SEP and BMEP amplitudes. 8 This suggests that varying types and levels of anesthesia may underlie the variability in reported MEP and SEP amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,12 Moreover, variability in MEP amplitudes has also been dramatic within studies. 7,9,11,12 In a previous study we have found that controlling the depth of anesthesia will reduce the variability in SEP and BMEP amplitudes. 8 This suggests that varying types and levels of anesthesia may underlie the variability in reported MEP and SEP amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7,9,10 One of the reasons for this lack in correlation may be the great variability in the shape and the size (amplitude) of the recorded signals. Indeed, dierent groups have reported electromyographic MEP amplitudes in healthy rats ranging from as low as 50 mV 11 to more than 10 mV. 7,12 Moreover, variability in MEP amplitudes has also been dramatic within studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Bennett (1983) concluded that monitoring of ascending evoked activity (e.g., SSEPs or aSCEPs) would reflect changes in descending spinal cord conduction for compressive and higher magnitude ischemic spinal cord insults. Despite the controversy, SSEPs seem to be related to the extent of spinal cord lesion and functional recovery of ambulatory capacity and they are being used for predicting outcome in experimental studies and in humans after SCI (Fehlings et al, 1988;Nuwer, 1988;Onishi et al, 1991;Zileli and Schramm, 1991).…”
Section: Scep As An Outcome Parameter For Quantification Of Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, a 15–20% decrease in amplitude has been recognized as a significant indicator of SEP variations [1, 22, 23]. Such variations in SEP are measured as extensions of the period of distal latency and decreases in amplitude [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%