2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00014-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor unit recruitment and EMG power spectra during ramp contractions of a bifunctional muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present investigation, most of the motor units had been recruited by approximately 70% MVC (see Fig. 1), which would stabilize the overall MPF, and contribute to the plateau in MPF that was observed in this and other studies at high force levels (Dupont et al 2000;Moritani and Muro 1987). Other recent studies based on the modeling and experimental data suggest that motor unit synchronization may increase at higher forces and this may produce some Xattening or small declines in MPF at high forces (Fling et al 2008;Gabriel and Kamen 2009).…”
Section: Mean Power Frequencysupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present investigation, most of the motor units had been recruited by approximately 70% MVC (see Fig. 1), which would stabilize the overall MPF, and contribute to the plateau in MPF that was observed in this and other studies at high force levels (Dupont et al 2000;Moritani and Muro 1987). Other recent studies based on the modeling and experimental data suggest that motor unit synchronization may increase at higher forces and this may produce some Xattening or small declines in MPF at high forces (Fling et al 2008;Gabriel and Kamen 2009).…”
Section: Mean Power Frequencysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Surface EMG recordings have been used to describe basic motor unit recruitment and Wring patterns (Broman et al 1985;Fuglsang-Frederiksen and Ronager 1988); to quantify diVerences in motor unit Wring behavior among diVerent force production tasks (Dupont et al 2000;Sbriccoli et al 2003;Weytjens and van Steenberghe 1984); to characterize changes in motor unit Wring behavior during the development of muscular fatigue (Krogh-Lund 1993;Moritani et al 1986); to explain diVerences in motor unit Wring behavior between young and older individuals (Lindeman et al 1999;Macaluso et al 2000;Yamada et al 2002); and to explain changes in motor unit Wring behavior in response to training (Aagaard et al 2000;Felici et al 2001;Gabriel and Boucher 1998). All of these interpretations have been made in the absence of any direct recordings of individual motor unit activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the RMS data sometimes showed an initial increase followed by a decrease, the linear regressions were fitted only from the initial value to the maximal value obtained during each trial. 10,29,41 However, in most cases, the maximal RMS value was reached at the end of the contraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Study by [19] Bilodeau et al (2003), [20] Pérot et al (1996) and [21] Stulen and DeLuca (1981) related the relationship of curve in ramp contraction were this behavior can be confirmed between of recruitment of large, type II muscles fibers, with a higher muscle action potential conduction velocity, is associated with an increase in the median frequency or mean power frequency values of the power spectrum of sEMG [22].…”
Section: Computational Intelligence In Electromyography Analysis -A Pmentioning
confidence: 94%