2017
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Recovery Prediction With Clinical Assessment and Local Diffusion Homogeneity After Acute Subcortical Infarction

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Initial clinical assessment or conventional diffusion tensor imaging parameters alone do not reliably predict poststroke recovery of motor function. Recently, local diffusion homogeneity (LDH) has been proposed to represent the local coherence of water molecule diffusion and can serve as a complementary marker for investigating white matter alterations of the brain. We aimed to determine whether a combination of initial clinical assessment and LDH could predict motor recovery after acute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our best knowledge, this is the first study that comprehensively compare LDH and FA in a imaging-based clinical research, and the first study using LDH for DWI-based brain alteration detection in T2DM (American Diabetes, 2010; Liu et al, 2016, 2017; Zhuo et al, 2016). In this study, voxel-based intra-voxel (FA) and inter-voxel diffusivity metrics (LDH) were used in a whole-brain exploratory study to explore and compare their sensitivity in between-group comparison and brain-clinical association analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our best knowledge, this is the first study that comprehensively compare LDH and FA in a imaging-based clinical research, and the first study using LDH for DWI-based brain alteration detection in T2DM (American Diabetes, 2010; Liu et al, 2016, 2017; Zhuo et al, 2016). In this study, voxel-based intra-voxel (FA) and inter-voxel diffusivity metrics (LDH) were used in a whole-brain exploratory study to explore and compare their sensitivity in between-group comparison and brain-clinical association analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance is used to quantify such an overall diffusivity similarity between a centered voxel and those of all its nearest neighborhood (Gong, 2013). For example, a higher LDH value may indicate local coherence enhancement of the fibers, possibly caused by changes in fiber myelination, diameter, or density (Gong, 2013; Liu et al, 2016, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study protocol was planned as a 12‐week longitudinal investigation, with neurological assessment and acquisition of MRI data at three time points: during the first week after symptom onset (<7 days), at the end of the fourth week (28 ± 4 days) and at the end of the twelfth week (84 ± 4 days) . Control participants were scanned only once.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A motor deficit evaluation was performed at each time point after the stroke using the Fugl‐Meyer (FM) scale. Good recovery of motor function was defined according to a proportional recovery model residual value of <20 (Appendix S1) . According to the degree of motor recovery at the twelfth week after stroke, patients with stroke were further divided into better recovery (BR; FM score ≥95) and worse recovery (WR; FM score <95) subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with cortical stroke are known to manifest worse baseline National Institute of Health Scale/Score (i.e., stroke severity) on average than patients with subcortical lesions. Conversely, a single subcortical white matter damage would result in cortical differentiation causing widespread cortical dysfunction or severe motor impairment and poor motor recovery [63,64]. Hence, when evaluating the effect of fMV/WBV on post-stroke recovery, it should be taken into account that the efficacy would depend on the specific pattern of brain damage [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%