2018
DOI: 10.3389/fict.2018.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Impairment Estimates via Touchscreen Typing Dynamics Toward Parkinson's Disease Detection From Data Harvested In-the-Wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correlation analysis between the subjects’ upper extremity UPDRS Part III single items 22/23/31 and the hybrid model predicted parameters, i.e., dRSi, dAFSi, DBSi, exhibited correlation of 0.66/0.73/0.58, respectively. These results show that the proposed hybrid approach outperforms the previous method developed 19 , which achieved corresponding correlations of 0.64/0.58/0.55, respectively. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A correlation analysis between the subjects’ upper extremity UPDRS Part III single items 22/23/31 and the hybrid model predicted parameters, i.e., dRSi, dAFSi, DBSi, exhibited correlation of 0.66/0.73/0.58, respectively. These results show that the proposed hybrid approach outperforms the previous method developed 19 , which achieved corresponding correlations of 0.64/0.58/0.55, respectively. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…3 . In particular, the performance of the predicted dRSi, dAFSi, DBSi values per subject, when compared to the previous method 19 , the UPDRS Single Item score 22/23/31 and the sum of UPDRS Part III items, is depicted. Specifically, in T1 scenario, the dRSi was the best performing typing-based index, achieving 0.89 [with 0.83–0.97 95% confidence interval (CI)] area under the ROC curve (AUC), and with 0.90/0.83 sensitivity/specificity, whereas the UPDRS Part III items 22/23/31 achieved AUC of 0.84 (with 0.77–0.92 95% CI)/0.77 (with 0.69–0.86 95% CI)/0.93 (with 0.87–0.98 95% CI) with {0.94/0.73 ,0.94/0.60, 0.88/0.95} sensitivity/specificity per item, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Iakovakis et al (Iakovakis et al 2018a) explored in-the-clinic assessment to classify early PD patients and controls. In this study, estimation of individual fine-motor impairment severity scores is employed to interpret the footprint of specific underlying symptoms, such as brady-/hypokinesia (B/H-K) and rigidity (R), to keystroke dynamics that cause group-wise variations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many researchers have thought of techniques for diagnosing PD which do not entail trained specialists or a complex medical environment. In some studies, the authors use touch screen data from several users of smart phones in order to detect PD [6,7]. Meanwhile in others, the authors use drawing movements as a biomarker to determine the motor impairments related to early PD symptoms [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%