Motor Imagery, Physical Practice, and Memory: The Effects on Performance and Workload

Abstract

-The theoretical explanations used to explain changes in performance during motor imagery and physical practice conditions are inconsistent when memory retrieval is and is not required. This study measured performance time and workload during acquisition, a retention test requiring memory retrieval, and a retention test not requiring memory retrieval using a key-pressing task. The participants were assigned to physical practice with or without instructions to learn or motor imagery with or without instructions to learn. A diagram of the keys was presented during the practice trials and the first retention test, but was not presented during the second test. The results revealed no effect for the learning instructions or performance changes during the practice phases. However, during both retention tests participants in the physical practice conditions performed significantly faster than those in the motor imagery conditions. Also, higher levels of workload were reported for the motor imagery conditions when the retention test required memory retrieval compared to the other phases. A discussion of the implications of workload on performance is presented with respect to varying practice conditions.

The Effects of Texting, Sitting Surface Stability, and Balance Training on Simulated Driving Performance and Perceived Workload in Young and Older Drivers

“…Perceived workload. Following previous work, we used the average score of the six subscales of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index workload questionnaire as the measure of total workload (Bahmani, Bahram, Diekfuss, & Arsham, 2019;Raisbeck, Diekfuss, Wyatt, & Shea, 2015).…”

Can We Capitalize on Central Nervous System Plasticity in Young Athletes to Inoculate Against Injury?

“…To accomplish optimal learning environments, limitations with respect to motor learning literature should also be considered. Specifically, many classic studies tuse terms such as "practice" or "acquisition" interchangeable with "training", as they have relied on short-term interventions of one or two days and "retention/learning" assessments following rest periods as low as 20 min [139,140] and typically not more than 24 h [78,159,160]. While still important contributions to the literature, the nuanced differences between motor performance and motor learning [79,147] are not always clearly delineated, specifically as to whether a learned behavior may actually be retained for an extended time period.…”