2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor imagery in blind subjects: The influence of the previous visual experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the task familiarity, the congenitally blind subjects are able to perform visual MI, though made more errors. Imbiriba et al (2006) made similar conclusions for blind individuals. Thus, clearly there is conflicting information regarding the role of familiarity in the successfully using MI due to several definitions of terms such as "motor tasks" and "novelty".…”
Section: Factors That Influence On Motor Imagery Practicesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…With regard to the task familiarity, the congenitally blind subjects are able to perform visual MI, though made more errors. Imbiriba et al (2006) made similar conclusions for blind individuals. Thus, clearly there is conflicting information regarding the role of familiarity in the successfully using MI due to several definitions of terms such as "motor tasks" and "novelty".…”
Section: Factors That Influence On Motor Imagery Practicesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The preservation of motor imagery vividness in the late blindness group can likely be explained by the preservation in memory of a mental representation of movement acquired prior to becoming functionally blind and the retrieval of visual aspects related to limb and body movements stored in memory. 26 Kinesthetic information, which is still available, further contributes to maintain movement representation. However, participants with late blindness not only maintained a good mental representation of movements, but showed a better performance than age-matched sighted individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postnatally blind subjects permit an assessment of the possible contribution of some prior visual experience compared with congenitally blind subjects, who have never experienced visual feedback and have no memory of motor performance under visual guidance (Imbiriba et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%