Motor expertise and performance in sport-specific priming tasks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective The present study aimed to summarize findings relevant to the influence of motor expertise on performance in sport-specific priming tasks and to examine potential moderators of this effect. Methodology Data were collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PsychInfo, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Baidu Scholar and Sport Discus and Dissertation Abstracts Online databases from January 1999 to April 2020, supplemented by manual bibliographies and meeting minutes. Stata software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated systematically using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were calculated with a random-effects model. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Begg funnel plots and Egger tests were conducted to assess publication bias. Results Nine articles (including 12 studies) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity was observed among these studies (Q = 44.42, P < 0.001, I2 = 75.2%) according to random-effects modeling. The results showed an overall advantage in favor of motor experts in sport-specific priming tasks (SMD = −1.01, 95% CI [−1.41 to −0.61]). However, the magnitude of that effect was moderated by sport type (interceptive sports/independent sports) and prime stimulus type (subliminal stimulus/supraliminal stimulus). No publication bias was detected by the Begg and Egger tests. Conclusions In general, compared with those of nonexperts, the responses of motor experts’ responses to a target stimulus are easier and faster when the prime and target stimuli are consistent. However, the magnitude of this effect is moderated by sport type and prime stimulus type.

The Lateralization of Spatial Cognition in Table Tennis Players: Neuroplasticity in the Dominant Hemisphere

“…Table tennis players engaging in sports-related spatial cognitive tasks can use their brains’ neural resources in highly efficient ways, as reflected in the activation level of the frontal and parietal cortex and changes in the rhythmic coupling of various brain regions (including the frontal-occipital, frontal-temporal, and frontal-parietal regions). This efficiency is particularly reflected in the late processing period [ 58 ]. These findings are consistent with the trends in the late P3 component in this study.…”

Unconsciously triggered cognitive conflict influences perceptual choice in active and sedentary individuals

“…Long-term participation in physical activities improves cognitive functions, especially in adolescents ( Chaddock et al, 2011 ). The cognitive function of people who engage in sports is advantageous in the consciousness as well as unconsciousness fields ( Jiang et al, 2021 , 2023 ), and the advantages in processing unconscious information is not only reflected in the reaction time, but also in the neural mechanism ( Güldenpenning et al, 2013 ; Calmels et al, 2018 ; Jiang et al, 2023 ). Due to the long-term participation in sports exercise, and the need for rapid decision-making and reaction in the sports scene, the nervous system of people who participate in regular sports may have specific changes.…”