2006
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000215948.97195.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Improves Outcome after Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A Historical Control Study

Abstract: The applied motor evoked potential methods seem to improve long-term motor outcome significantly. Early motor outcome is similar because of transient motor deficits in the INM group, which can be predicted at the end of surgery by the neurophysiological profile of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
229
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
229
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, intraoperative spinal eMEP recording has proven very valuable in spinal cord tumor surgery because it allows monitoring of D waves and the intraoperative decrease in its amplitude (41,50). The major advantage of combined mMEP and eMEP monitoring is that it identifies impairment of the functional integrity of the motor pathways before a permanent deficit has occurred (38,40,41,70).…”
Section: Ionmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, intraoperative spinal eMEP recording has proven very valuable in spinal cord tumor surgery because it allows monitoring of D waves and the intraoperative decrease in its amplitude (41,50). The major advantage of combined mMEP and eMEP monitoring is that it identifies impairment of the functional integrity of the motor pathways before a permanent deficit has occurred (38,40,41,70).…”
Section: Ionmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MEPs are well established for the early detection of impending motor deficit during surgery of cranial procedures [10,11,14,17,19] and the spinal cord [1,5,15,16], for brainstem surgery a warning criterion has not yet become generally accepted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LR between 1 and 2 and between 0.5-1 rarely alter pretest probability. 6 Despite traditional spinal IOM literature suggests that NIOM is effective in identifying patients at a high risk for sustaining new spinal cord injuries [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] as well as animal research has supported human experience, [16][17][18] there is a heterogeneity in IOM services and this should be reviewed to see what accounts for the difference in false-positive and false-negative cases in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%