1948
DOI: 10.1037/h0055665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor effects of strong auditory stimuli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With stimulus repetition, measures of auditoo startle exhibit, in common with orienting, a rapid decrement in initial response amplitude. This is true of cardiac acceleration in humans (Berg & Beebe-Center, 1941;Raskin et al, 1969;Graham & Slaby, 1973), short latency muscle potentials in humans (Davis, 1948) and rats (Prosser & Hunter, 1939), and whole body startle in both rats (Davis, 1972) and humans (Landis & Hunt, 1939). Dishabituation without increased intensity of cardiac responses (Berg & Beebe-Center, 1941) and muscle potentials (Prosser & Hunter, 1939) further emphasizes the importance of stimulus change to the startle system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With stimulus repetition, measures of auditoo startle exhibit, in common with orienting, a rapid decrement in initial response amplitude. This is true of cardiac acceleration in humans (Berg & Beebe-Center, 1941;Raskin et al, 1969;Graham & Slaby, 1973), short latency muscle potentials in humans (Davis, 1948) and rats (Prosser & Hunter, 1939), and whole body startle in both rats (Davis, 1972) and humans (Landis & Hunt, 1939). Dishabituation without increased intensity of cardiac responses (Berg & Beebe-Center, 1941) and muscle potentials (Prosser & Hunter, 1939) further emphasizes the importance of stimulus change to the startle system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly assumed that WN affects arousal and some physiological evidence supports this assumption (Magoun, 1963;Davis, 1948; Berlyne & Lewis, 1963) but doubts about the unitary nature of arousal and its behavioural consequences must induce caution in interpreting the data. Uehling (1972), Craik & Blankstein (1975) and Eysenck (1976) reviewed the evidence on arousal and learning; they agree that there is good support for a positive relation between arousal at learning and long-term recall, and that the results for short-term recall are confused, differing for different experimental paradigms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that this session was in preparation for a series of studies that addressed the classic work of Landis and Hunt (1939) on the startle response (Davis, 1948b(Davis, , 1948c(Davis, , 1950Davis & Van Liere, 1949).…”
Section: The Davis Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of studies completed just before his death, he used muscle potentials to evaluate the response to feedback in rote learning tasks and discussed the observed somatic response patterns in relation to various learning theories (Berry & Davis, 2. In a 1948 paper, Davis (1948b) makes what now seems to be an understated nod to the future. In a footnote, he suggests that brain potentials might also be used to clarify the processes intervening between stimulus and response should the method utilizing muscle potentials fail.…”
Section: Muscle Action Potentials: Studying Psychological Processes Bmentioning
confidence: 99%