Motor Developmental Delay After Cardiac Surgery in Children With a Critical Congenital Heart Defect: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Sprong, Maaike C. A.; Broeders, Willem; Net, Janjaap van der; Breur, Johannes M.P.J.; Vries, Linda S. de; Slieker, Martijn G.; Brussel, Marco van

doi:10.1097/pep.0000000000000827

Cited by 15 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifteen SRs (22.1%) were available open access 86,88,90,93,98,101,104,114,115,119,128,133–136 . A statement that PRISMA or similar reporting guidelines had been followed were present in 61 (89.7%) of the published studies 79,81–100,103–109,112,116,118,124,134,137–140 . Refs 8,113–115,117,119–122,125–128,130–133,135,136,141–144 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…86,88,90,93,98,101,104,114,115,119,128,[133][134][135][136] A statement that PRISMA or similar reporting guidelines had been followed were present in 61 (89.7%) of the published studies. 79,81-100, [103][104][105][106][107][108][109]112,116,118,124,134,[137][138][139][140] Refs. 8,[113][114][115]117,[119][120][121][122][125][126][127][128][130][131][132][133]135,136,[141]…”

Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

McClenahan

Lojacono

Young

et al. 2023

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RationaleThe physiotherapy profession strives to be a leader in providing quality care and strongly recognizes the value of research to guide clinical practice. Adherence to guidelines for research reporting and conduct is a significant step towards high‐quality, transparent and reproducible research.Aim/ObjectiveAssess integrity between planned and conducted methodology in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) published in physiotherapy journals.MethodsEighteen journals were manually searched for RCTs and SRs published from 1 July 2021 through 31 December 2021. Studies were included if the journal or specific study was indexed in PubMed and published/translated in English. Descriptive statistics determined congruence between preregistration data and publication.ResultsForty RCTs and 68 SRs were assessed. Forty‐three SRs included meta‐analysis (MA). Of the 34 registered RCTs, 7 (20.6%) had no discrepancy between the registration and publication. Two trials (5.9%) addressed all discrepancies, 4 (11.8%) addressed some and 21 (61.8%) did not address any discrepancies. Of the 36 registered MAs, 33 (91.7%) had discrepancies between the registration and publication. Two (5.6%) addressed all discrepancies and three (8.3%) had no discrepancies. Eight SRs without MA published information not matching their registration, and none provided justification for the discrepancies.ConclusionMost RCTs/SRs were registered; the majority had discrepancies between preregistration and publication, potentially influencing the outcomes and interpretations of findings. Journals should require preregistration and compare the submission with the registration information when assessing publication suitability. Readers should be aware of these inconsistencies and their implications when interpreting and translating results into practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

McClenahan

Lojacono

Young

et al. 2023

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…32 Sensorimotor systems are among the first brain areas to develop 15 and serve as the foundation for subsequent development and learning as infants use movement to interact with their environments. 33,34 Motor development is commonly impaired in infants with CHD, 8,29,35 particularly in those with critical CHD where over half of infants exhibit gross motor delay. 8,36 Feeding difficulties are also observed in infants with CHD 10,29 and serve as an early sign of later impairments, including language delay.…”

Section: Neurodevelopment Across the Life Coursementioning

confidence: 99%

Neurodevelopment in the Congenital Heart Disease Population as Framed by the Life Course Health Development Framework

Smith

Harrison

2023

J Cardiovasc Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Over recent decades, delays in motor abilities using measures that combine both gross and fine motor scores have commonly been reported in toddlers after early complex cardiac surgery. [1][2][3] Impaired gross motor abilities for pre-school and school-age children with CHDs have been reported, with concern for low tone and poor balance skills. [4][5][6] Mild to moderate improvement in motor function has been suggested to occur between age 1 and 6 years.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in gross motor and fine motor outcomes for toddlers after early complex cardiac surgery

Robertson,

Khademioureh,

Dinu

et al. 2024

Cardiol Young

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To determine whether gross motor scores of toddlers after complex cardiac surgery were different from fine motor scores and were adequately represented by motor composite scores and, whether acute care predictors and chronic childhood health markers of gross motor scores differed from those of fine motor. Methods: This prospective inception-cohort outcomes study included 171 toddlers after complex cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at age <6 months, born in Northern Alberta from 2009 to 2019, and without known chromosomal abnormalities. At a mean (standard deviation) age of 21.7 (3.7) months, the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III determined motor composite and scaled scores (normative values, 100 (15), 10 (3), respectively). The same variables from surgery and assessment were analysed using multivariate regression to predict gross and fine motor scores; results expressed as effect size (95% confidence interval) with % variance. Results: Composite, fine, and gross motor scores were 89.7 (14.2), 9.4 (2.5), and 7.2 (2.7), respectively. Predictive variables accounted for 21.2% of the variance for fine motor, and 36.9% for gross motor. Multivariate analysis for gross motor scores included toddlers need for cardiac medication, effect size (95% confidence interval) −0.801 (−1.62, −0.02), gastrostomy, −1.35 (−2.39, −0.319), and single ventricle, −0.93 (−1.71, −0.15). These same variables did not predict fine motor scores. Conclusion: Gross motor skills commonly were lower than fine motor skills for toddlers after complex cardiac surgery. Predictors for gross motor scores differed from fine motor scores. Separate reporting of gross motor scores could lead to improved identification of predictors of delay and to optimised early intervention.

show abstract

Motor Developmental Delay After Cardiac Surgery in Children With a Critical Congenital Heart Defect: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Cited by 15 publications

References 97 publications

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer‐reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

Neurodevelopment in the Congenital Heart Disease Population as Framed by the Life Course Health Development Framework

Differences in gross motor and fine motor outcomes for toddlers after early complex cardiac surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About