The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/502096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Cortex Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Abstract: Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) is less efficacious than Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease. However, it might be proposed to patients excluded from DBS or unresponsive to DBS. Ten patients with advanced PD underwent unilateral MCS contralaterally to the worst clinical side. A plate electrode was positioned over the motor cortex in the epidural space through single burr hole after identification of the area with neuronavigation and neurophysiological tests. Clinical assessment was performed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea is supported by the literature showing STN‐HFS is effective in suppressing abnormal activity in the motor cortex of patients with PD (Sabatini et al ., ; Payoux et al ., ; Haslinger et al ., ). Additionally, transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex is also efficacious in ameliorating motor symptoms of PD (Cioni, ; De Rose et al ., ; Broeder et al ., ) and levodopa‐induced dyskinesias (Ferrucci et al ., ). In summary, it is very likely that STN‐HFS alters the temporal structure and dynamics of a complex set of pathways within the entire cortico‐basal ganglia‐thalamocortical loop.…”
Section: Synaptic and Neuromodulatory Control Of The Gpementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This idea is supported by the literature showing STN‐HFS is effective in suppressing abnormal activity in the motor cortex of patients with PD (Sabatini et al ., ; Payoux et al ., ; Haslinger et al ., ). Additionally, transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex is also efficacious in ameliorating motor symptoms of PD (Cioni, ; De Rose et al ., ; Broeder et al ., ) and levodopa‐induced dyskinesias (Ferrucci et al ., ). In summary, it is very likely that STN‐HFS alters the temporal structure and dynamics of a complex set of pathways within the entire cortico‐basal ganglia‐thalamocortical loop.…”
Section: Synaptic and Neuromodulatory Control Of The Gpementioning
confidence: 98%
“… 32 34) It is possible that future procedures will incorporate multi-site modulation to address the full gamut of dopaminergic, axial, and cognitive impairments advanced PD patients endure. 11 , 32 , 35 39 ) It is certain that clinicians will need to keenly match patients' symptoms with known outcomes of a number of neuroanatomic targets, unilateral and bilateral stimulation, as well as various stimulatory parameters including frequency, intensity, pulse width, and constant-current vs. voltage-controlled stimulation. 40 43) …”
Section: Dbs For Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies resulted in promising reduction in PD symptoms assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and reduced levodopa dosage. 18,31,116,142 However, others reported no major improvement in motor function. 26,137 Based on anecdotal reports showing improved motor function when stroke patients with chronic pain were treated by motor cortex stimulation, 61,149 an initial study using subthreshold epidural motor cortex stimulation on a hemiparetic stroke patient was performed.…”
Section: Human Trials Of Direct Cortical and Spinal Cord Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%