2008
DOI: 10.1179/174313208x332968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor cortex changes in spinal cord injury: a TMS study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data support previous findings reporting increased excitability after complete SCI in spared neural pathways (Topka et al, 1991). Reduced intracortical inhibition after SCI is thought to enable unmasking of latent synaptic connections at the cortical level, providing a possible causal mechanism for cerebral plasticity after SCI (Saturno et al, 2008). As MI and PP are assumed to be functionally equivalent, it is plausible that changes in intracortical inhibition of the sensorimotor cortex (allowing the reshaping of actual motor performance) may be reflected during MI, hence confirming some shared neural substrates between these two processes.…”
Section: Clinical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data support previous findings reporting increased excitability after complete SCI in spared neural pathways (Topka et al, 1991). Reduced intracortical inhibition after SCI is thought to enable unmasking of latent synaptic connections at the cortical level, providing a possible causal mechanism for cerebral plasticity after SCI (Saturno et al, 2008). As MI and PP are assumed to be functionally equivalent, it is plausible that changes in intracortical inhibition of the sensorimotor cortex (allowing the reshaping of actual motor performance) may be reflected during MI, hence confirming some shared neural substrates between these two processes.…”
Section: Clinical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both groups did not have significant differences in exercise intensity and WP speed, there were different PAF reactions following WP exercise for both groups. A prior study showed that brain activity in SCI individuals was different from healthy controls because of deafferentation (16,17), resulting in the imbalance of excitation and inhibition (36). Consequently, brain wave activity and functional changes in the motor cortex after SCI resulted in a different PAF reaction to WP exercise compared with the HC group.…”
Section: The Authors Declare No Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,10 Two single-subject reports have shown that the short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) 11 is reduced after incomplete SCI. 5,8 However, SICI was examined only with one single conditioning and test stimulus intensity. Studying SICI over a range of intensities has become increasingly important for the recruitment of neurons by the test stimulus pulse that are differentially susceptible to SICI modulation, [12][13][14] and the contribution from short-interval intracortical facilitation activated by the conditioning stimulus cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Previous studies evaluating motor cortex excitability after SCI showed that the activity of intracortical inhibitory circuits may be reduced after incomplete SCI. [4][5][6][7][8] Cortical inhibition has been studied using the application of sub-threshold TMS, 4,6,7 a technique that temporarily inhibits the ongoing electromyogram (EMG), likely through the activation of intracortical inhibitory neurons with connections onto fast-conducing corticospinal axons that drive the motoneurones during voluntary contractions. 9 Within several weeks of SCI, the onset of EMG suppression is~25 ms longer than the latency of the motor evoked potential (MEP), whereas the latency difference is only~13 ms in healthy controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%