2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87455-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor and sensory features successfully decode autism spectrum disorder and combine with the original RDoC framework to boost diagnostic classification

Abstract: Sensory processing and motor coordination atypicalities are not commonly identified as primary characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), nor are they well captured in the NIMH’s original Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Here, motor and sensory features performed similarly to RDoC features in support vector classification of 30 ASD youth against 33 typically developing controls. Combining sensory with RDoC features boosted classification performance, achieving a Matthews Correlation Coefficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite RdoC criteria holding promise as a means of characterizing the diversity in ASD, it is important to recognize that it is still in its infancy. There are few studies that have empirically examined the veracity of RdoC with respect to ASD, with studies continuing to offer refinements and additions to this framework (e.g., Harrison et al, 2021; Tschida & Yerys, 2020). Additionally, RdoC is not intended to fully replace current diagnostic criteria, but provides a translational and transdiagnostic approach to researching and understanding mental health conditions, including ASD (Cuthbert & Insel, 2013; Mandy, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite RdoC criteria holding promise as a means of characterizing the diversity in ASD, it is important to recognize that it is still in its infancy. There are few studies that have empirically examined the veracity of RdoC with respect to ASD, with studies continuing to offer refinements and additions to this framework (e.g., Harrison et al, 2021; Tschida & Yerys, 2020). Additionally, RdoC is not intended to fully replace current diagnostic criteria, but provides a translational and transdiagnostic approach to researching and understanding mental health conditions, including ASD (Cuthbert & Insel, 2013; Mandy, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the current study was to explore the contributions of sensory modulation to the DCD phenotype and to understand the relationship between sensory, social emotional, behavior, and motor features in this population in comparison to children with ASD and TD children. We expand upon our previous findings [ 23 ] by including larger sample sizes, a different socio-emotional measure (e.g., SCARED-P), and an assessment of repetitive behavior (RBS-R). The following questions are addressed: Do children with DCD experience differences in sensory processing?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), also known as dyspraxia, is a neuromotor disorder characterized by impairments in the development of motor coordination including dexterity, limb speed, and gross and fine motor skills that are not due to an intellectual disability or other neurological disorder affecting movement [ 3 , 21 , 22 ]. It is estimated that DCD affects 5–6% of children and may significantly interfere with activities of daily living and school performance [ 21 , 23 ]. DCD is also a common comorbidity in children with ASD, with approximately 60–90% meeting the criteria for DCD [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations