1999
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Activity Assessment Scale

Abstract: The MAAS is a valid and reliable sedation scale for use with mechanically ventilated patients in the SICU. Further studies are warranted regarding the effect of MAAS implementation in our SICU on patient outcomes, such as quality of sedation and length of mechanical ventilation, as well as the use of the MAAS in other patient populations (e.g., medical).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale is adopted from (16) to assess patients' levels of sedation or irritability and restlessness regarding performing coma arousal technique practices. It is a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (unresponsive) to 6 (dangerously agitated).…”
Section: Tool (V): Motor Activity Assessment Scale (Maas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This scale is adopted from (16) to assess patients' levels of sedation or irritability and restlessness regarding performing coma arousal technique practices. It is a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (unresponsive) to 6 (dangerously agitated).…”
Section: Tool (V): Motor Activity Assessment Scale (Maas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the reliability and validity of the SMART was assessed by Gill-Thwaites and Munday, (2004) (18) who reported that Cronbach α 0.89 and a Kappa coefficient of 0.97. Concerning MAAS, it was previously tested for validity and reliability and was considered as a valid and reliable sedation scale for use by nurses for mechanically ventilated patients by Devlin et al (1999) (16) .…”
Section: Validity and Reliability Of Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RASS and two other agitation scales were monitored: MAAS [16] and the Ramsay score [17]. We also monitored the following physiological variables: respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, and airway occlusion pressure during the first 0.1 seconds of inspiration (P 0.1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the distribution of morphine equivalent doses in mg/kg/day in 26 studies. The median dose was 0.7 mg/kg/day or about 49 mg/day for a patient weighing 70 kg (Sun et al 1992;Carrasco et al 1993;Sun and Weissman 1994;Ronan et al 1995;Kress et al 1996;Barrientos-Vega et al 1997;Devlin et al 1997;McLeod et al 1997;Watling et al 1997;Weinbroum et al 1997;Cammarano et al 1998; Sanchez-Izquierdo-Riera et al Brook et al 1999;Devlin et al 1999;Swart et al 1999;Fraser et al 2000;Kress et al 2000;Brandl et al 2001;Ely et al 2001;Payen et al 2001;Ely et al 2003;De Jonghe et al 2005;Kahn et al 2005;Carson et al 2006;Wolthuis et al 2007;Girard et al 2008). …”
Section: Opioid Use In the Icumentioning
confidence: 99%