2015
DOI: 10.1017/s030500411500064x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivic invariants of real polynomial functions and their Newton polyhedrons

Abstract: We give an expression of the motivic zeta function for a real polynomial function in terms of the Newton polyhedron of the function. As a consequence, we show that the weights are determined by the motivic zeta function for convenient weighted homogeneous polynomials in three variables. We apply this result to the blow-Nash equivalence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar formula to the one of the following result has been proved in different settings: by Varchenko for the zeta function of the monodromy, by Denef and Loeser [, § 5] for the topological zeta function, by Denef and Hoornaert [, Theorem 4.2] for the Igusa p‐adic zeta function and by Guibert for the motivic zeta function [, Proposition 2.1.3]. The proof of Fichou and Fukui already relies on an adaptation of this construction to the virtual Poincaré polynomial. Theorem Let fR[x1,,xd] be non‐degenerate, then the following equality holds in scriptM̂T: truerightZf(T)=leftτnormalΓfc[]fτ:(double-struckR)dfτ1false(0false)double-struckR+[]prefixpr2:fτ1false(0false)(double-struckR)d×double-struckRdouble-struckRL1Tdouble-struck1L1Tleft×0.16emSσfalse(τfalse)(T),where R acts on fτ1false(0false)(double-struckR)d×double-struckR by λ·(x,t…”
Section: The Modified Zeta Function Of a Non‐degenerate Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar formula to the one of the following result has been proved in different settings: by Varchenko for the zeta function of the monodromy, by Denef and Loeser [, § 5] for the topological zeta function, by Denef and Hoornaert [, Theorem 4.2] for the Igusa p‐adic zeta function and by Guibert for the motivic zeta function [, Proposition 2.1.3]. The proof of Fichou and Fukui already relies on an adaptation of this construction to the virtual Poincaré polynomial. Theorem Let fR[x1,,xd] be non‐degenerate, then the following equality holds in scriptM̂T: truerightZf(T)=leftτnormalΓfc[]fτ:(double-struckR)dfτ1false(0false)double-struckR+[]prefixpr2:fτ1false(0false)(double-struckR)d×double-struckRdouble-struckRL1Tdouble-struck1L1Tleft×0.16emSσfalse(τfalse)(T),where R acts on fτ1false(0false)(double-struckR)d×double-struckR by λ·(x,t…”
Section: The Modified Zeta Function Of a Non‐degenerate Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…mon where the action is given by λ A similar formula to the one of the following result has been proved in different settings: by A. N. Varchenko [29] for the zeta function of the monodromy, by J. Denef and F. Loeser [6, §5] for the topological zeta function, by J. Denef and K. Hoornaert [5, Theorem 4.2] for the Igusa p-adic zeta function and by G. Guibert for the motivic zeta function [14, Proposition 2.1.3]. The proof of G. Fichou and T. Fukui [12] already relies on an adaptation of this construction to the virtual Poincaré polynomial.…”
Section: Proposition 212 ([3 End Of §3]) the Map Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case of a weighted homogeneous polynomial. In this section, we state a formula for the local motivic Milnor fibres associated with a polynomial function non-degenerate with respect to its Newton polyhedron (we will use such results in section 4), using results in [17]. We begin with some notation.…”
Section: Motivic Milnor Fibres With Signmentioning
confidence: 99%