Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational interviewing for substance abuse

Abstract: Co-registration This review is co-registered within both the Cochrane and CampbellCollaborations. A version of this review can also be found in the Cochrane Library. KeywordsContributions Karlsen conceived of the idea and commissioned the review. All reviewers were involved in planning the review. Smedslund wrote the methods section of the protocol. Karlsen and Smedslund wrote the background. Hammerstrøm developed the search strategy, performed the original searches and the final search in November 2010. All a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
79
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…MI: (Smedslund et al, 2011) CBT: (Magill y Ray 2009) MI and CBT 2 An average drop of 21.8 g of pure alcohol per day was assumed as the upper limit of the CI for MI/CBT (see above). We assumed proportional CIs compared to the first MI/CBT scenario.…”
Section: Infectious and Parasitic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI: (Smedslund et al, 2011) CBT: (Magill y Ray 2009) MI and CBT 2 An average drop of 21.8 g of pure alcohol per day was assumed as the upper limit of the CI for MI/CBT (see above). We assumed proportional CIs compared to the first MI/CBT scenario.…”
Section: Infectious and Parasitic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e) The original evaluation studies must have the following method characteristics: there must be at least one control or comparison group; the control group should be exposed to either no intervention or minimal treatment, and the control group must not include dropouts (people who had previously participated in the treatment program but later left it). Some systematic reviews which did not meet one or more of these criteria could not be included in this study (e.g., Adams, Leukefeld, & Peden, 2008;Bright & Martire, 2013;Egli, Pina, Skovbo Christensen, Aebi, & Killias, 2009;Ferri, Davoli, & Perucci, 2011;Fiestas & Ponce, 2012;Hedrich et al, 2011;Holloway, Bennett, & Farrington, 2005Koehler, Humphreys, Akoensi, Sanchez de Ribera, & Lösel, 2014;Larney, 2010;Mazerolle, Soole, & Rombouts, 2007;McMurran, 2006;Minozzi et al, 2011;Mitchell, Wilson, Eggers, & MacKenzie, 2012;Perry, 2006;Perry, Darwin, et al, 2009;Perry et al, 2013;Perry et al, 2015aPerry et al, , 2015bPerry, Newman, et al, 2009;Tripodi, Bledsoe, Kim, & Bender, 2011;Smedslund et al, 2011;Smith, Gates, & Foxcroft, 2006;Stallwitz & Stöver, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent systematic reviews of many studies involving about large samples of participants support evidence of the benefits of these brief interventions [23], including with youth [24] as they seem to improve outcomes regarding psychoactive substances use, compared with no intervention.…”
Section: Health Care Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%