2019
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational factors underlying different levels of reading comprehension of English language learners

Abstract: Most research on the predictors of successful reading comprehension in a second language (L2) has been focused on cognitive factors. Very few studies exist on how motivational factors impact L2 reading comprehension. In this study, 179 Chinese college students read passages in English (their L2) and answered either literal, relatively superficial questions reflecting text‐based comprehension (TBC) or deeper, inferential and critical questions reflecting higher order comprehension (HOC). The participants also c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data indicates that one of the elements influencing reading instruction's success is the students' motivation. Consistent with many research studies in the ELT field, reading motivation is a strong predictor of reading achievement (Lin et al, 2012;Xu & Durgunoğlu, 2020). Therefore, the teachers believe that they need to be equipped with strategies to improve students' motivation and autonomy to read English passages (Benson, 2013).…”
Section: Improving Students' Reading Motivation and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The data indicates that one of the elements influencing reading instruction's success is the students' motivation. Consistent with many research studies in the ELT field, reading motivation is a strong predictor of reading achievement (Lin et al, 2012;Xu & Durgunoğlu, 2020). Therefore, the teachers believe that they need to be equipped with strategies to improve students' motivation and autonomy to read English passages (Benson, 2013).…”
Section: Improving Students' Reading Motivation and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…(p. 138) Chun (2009, p. 152) similarly believes that graphic novels allow for "emotional engagement" with a story's characters in ways unique to this form of literature. Studies of English learners by Öz and Efecioğlu (2015) and Xu and Durgunoglu (2019) show that engagement in a text results in deeper, more personal responses to the materials. The accessibility and emotional engagement of graphic novels provide prime opportunities for teachers to address challenging issues related to social justice in a variety of cultural contexts.…”
Section: Engaging Readers Through Emotional Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chun (2009, p. 152) similarly believes that graphic novels allow for “emotional engagement” with a story’s characters in ways unique to this form of literature. Studies of English learners by Öz and Efecioğlu (2015) and Xu and Durgunoglu (2019) show that engagement in a text results in deeper, more personal responses to the materials.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been some studies which focus on exploring students' L1 (Chinese) reading motivation in Hong Kong and Taiwan (Huang, 2013; Lau, 2009), studies on Chinese EFL learners' L2 (English) reading motivation are sparse (Li et al, 2022). For instance, drawing on expectancy‐value theory, Xu and Durgunoğlu (2020) developed a reading motivation questionnaire for Chinese university EFL students and found their reading motivation consisted of importance, self‐efficacy, willingness to pay cost, intrinsic value, and extrinsic value. In another study, with reference to the literature on L1 reading motivation (Baker & Wigfield, 1999; Wang & Guthrie, 2004; Wigfield, 1997), Han (2021) explored the nature of Chinese university EFL students' reading motivation and found three constructs of reading motivation, including one intrinsic motivation scale (efficacy and engagement) and two extrinsic motivation scales (utility value; academic value).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%