2016
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2016.0148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational factors influencing teaching (FIT) as a career: An empirical study of the expatriate teachers in the Emirates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradicting the results of previous studies conducted on the FIT-Choice framework, the results of this study show how in the pandemic period, with teaching going virtual, job transferability has become an important point of consideration (Dhawan, 2020;Purwanto et al, 2020), which rather is of low relevance in usual times (Kilinç et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2012b;Watt & Richardson, 2007), followed by the teachers' self perception to effectively teach virtually and innovate through the processes of teaching (M = 4.26; SD = 0.925), corroborating the results of previous studies that showed that teachers' perception of their ability to teach virtually using information and communications technology (ICT) or in classrooms through traditional methods is a major motivator for their choice of teaching as their career (Akpochafo, 2020;Lin et al, 2012a;Lee et al, 2019). Social factors have been given high value as influential factors in the choice of a teaching career in studies conducted before, but in our results we see some contradiction (Wong & Moorhouse, 2020), where social contribution (M = 3.7559; SD = 0.85289) has a lower mean value in comparison to that in the previous studies (Richardson & Watt, 2006;Sharif et al, 2016;Torsney et al, 2019). The additionally identified factor such as teacher acting as the knowledge assimilator and institutional utility value came forward as one of the good influential factors.…”
Section: Results Of Descriptive and Inferential Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contradicting the results of previous studies conducted on the FIT-Choice framework, the results of this study show how in the pandemic period, with teaching going virtual, job transferability has become an important point of consideration (Dhawan, 2020;Purwanto et al, 2020), which rather is of low relevance in usual times (Kilinç et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2012b;Watt & Richardson, 2007), followed by the teachers' self perception to effectively teach virtually and innovate through the processes of teaching (M = 4.26; SD = 0.925), corroborating the results of previous studies that showed that teachers' perception of their ability to teach virtually using information and communications technology (ICT) or in classrooms through traditional methods is a major motivator for their choice of teaching as their career (Akpochafo, 2020;Lin et al, 2012a;Lee et al, 2019). Social factors have been given high value as influential factors in the choice of a teaching career in studies conducted before, but in our results we see some contradiction (Wong & Moorhouse, 2020), where social contribution (M = 3.7559; SD = 0.85289) has a lower mean value in comparison to that in the previous studies (Richardson & Watt, 2006;Sharif et al, 2016;Torsney et al, 2019). The additionally identified factor such as teacher acting as the knowledge assimilator and institutional utility value came forward as one of the good influential factors.…”
Section: Results Of Descriptive and Inferential Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…With institutions focusing on continuously building a competitive edge over their competitors in industry, the institutional utility value helps teachers align their personal utility with the institute's utility and hence helps in the prevention of absenteeism and excessive turnover (Chen et al, 2006;Dickter et al, 1996). Past international studies conducted on FIT Choice in nonpandemic days showed that the social utility values, teaching ability and intrinsic values are considered as the most important factors to choose and pursue teaching as the career (Hennessy & Lynch, 2017;Kilinç et al, 2012;König & Rothland, 2012;Salifu et al, 2018;Sharif et al, 2016). Not much difference has been displayed in the pandemic situation in the motivational factors for teachers to teach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers' professional wellbeing. Previous studies of teacher wellbeing by (Gomba, 2015;Mansfield & Beltman, 2019;Sharif, Upadhyay et al, 2016) argue that teaching is a unique profession because it is both physically and emotionally challenging. Survey items related to teacher professional wellbeing dimensions were based on Yildirim's (2015) study, which confirmed the scale's validity and reliability measuring teaching self-efficacy, job satisfaction and perceived recognition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers with sufficient instructional experience are supposed to focus broadly and show a higher degree of sustainability in the teaching profession and make it a life career (Feiman-Nemser, 2001). Regarding teaching experience, the study did not find any significant difference; this finding shows contradiction with the finding of Sharif et al (2016); accordingly, teaching and learning experiences contribute significantly in retaining teachers in the teaching profession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%