Abstract:This study explores the differences in the motivational profiles of under-achieving gifted students and high-achieving gifted and non-gifted students. In comparison to their high-achieving peers, under-achieving gifted students reported weaker motivational orientations, in both achievement and social goals, as well as in intrinsic motivation. Gifted high achievers reported stronger mastery, competitive, cooperative, and individual orientations than non-gifted high achievers. The findings seem to lend credence … Show more
“…Low achievers in terms of underachievers are those students who may perform below average. Still, they may have a high potential to perform high with proper alignment of their interest and learning style (Agaliotis & Kalyva, 2019). That means underachievement can be a product of misalignment of student interest and need to the classroom instruction.…”
There is limited evidence of underachieving students' mathematical experiences and the challenges they face in mathematics classes in the context of Nepal. This study explores the lived experiences of underachiever students in learning mathematics in a public school in Kathmandu, Nepal. The study participants were three ninth-grade students (two females and one male) who failed mathematics and repeated the grade. A sequence of in-depth interviews was administered with each participant to explore their lived experience of mathematics. The participants' narratives were constructed based on the temporal sequence of event analysis concerning their mathematics learning experience. Their narratives revealed three critical concerns in their experience of learning mathematics: mathematics is complicated, mathematics is abstract, and mathematics learning is rote memorization. Change of schools was one of the main reasons they had difficulty adjusting to the new environment, affecting their mathematics learning. Another concern they revealed was the obligation to support their parents during the out of school time or even during school time and being frequently absent in the class.
“…Low achievers in terms of underachievers are those students who may perform below average. Still, they may have a high potential to perform high with proper alignment of their interest and learning style (Agaliotis & Kalyva, 2019). That means underachievement can be a product of misalignment of student interest and need to the classroom instruction.…”
There is limited evidence of underachieving students' mathematical experiences and the challenges they face in mathematics classes in the context of Nepal. This study explores the lived experiences of underachiever students in learning mathematics in a public school in Kathmandu, Nepal. The study participants were three ninth-grade students (two females and one male) who failed mathematics and repeated the grade. A sequence of in-depth interviews was administered with each participant to explore their lived experience of mathematics. The participants' narratives were constructed based on the temporal sequence of event analysis concerning their mathematics learning experience. Their narratives revealed three critical concerns in their experience of learning mathematics: mathematics is complicated, mathematics is abstract, and mathematics learning is rote memorization. Change of schools was one of the main reasons they had difficulty adjusting to the new environment, affecting their mathematics learning. Another concern they revealed was the obligation to support their parents during the out of school time or even during school time and being frequently absent in the class.
“…Por otro lado, en el autoconcepto académico se observó que nueve de los niños disminuyeron sus puntajes, lo cual se contrapone con lo encontrado en otras investigaciones (Chávez-Soto & González, 2020;Kim, 2016). Una posible explicación para estos resultados es que los niños se encontraron más atraídos por las actividades extraescolares, ya que perciben una discrepancia de dificultad y estimulación con lo visto en el aula; ello muestra la pertinencia de enseñar a través de actividades atractivas que motiven a los niños (Agaliotis & Kalyva, 2019;Chávez-Soto, 2014).…”
(analítico)El objetivo del estudio fue conocer los efectos del programa de enriquecimiento Programando-ando, en los niveles de autoconcepto académico, creatividad e inteligencia en alumnos con aptitudes sobresalientes de educación primaria. Se utilizó un diseño pretestpostest; participaron 13 estudiantes que cumplieron con el perfil sobresaliente y, con base en sus características, se diseñó e instrumentó la intervención para la promoción de las habilidades digitales y verbales. Los resultados mostraron efectos positivos en las capacidades cognoscitivas de los niños y en el pensamiento creativo. En elcaso del autoconcepto se encontró un decremento no significativo. Se concluye que el programa de intervención basado en el enriquecimiento y la solución de problemas a través de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación logró favorecer las capacidades sobresalientes de los estudiantes.
Palabras clave: Inteligencia, creatividad, tecnología educacional, tecnología de la información, TIC, enseñanza primaria.
“…This definition was appropriate in our study since our focus was on high-achieving students in mixed-ability classrooms rather than gifted students in specialized gifted programs. We excluded studies investigating only underachieving students as our systematic review focused on mixed-ability classrooms and because underachieving students differ in their characteristics from high-achieving students (Agaliotis & Kalyva, 2019; McCoach & Siegle, 2003). Finally, we investigated primary and secondary education since DI is important in both settings.…”
Section: Research On the Impact Of DI On Students’ Outcomesmentioning
Promoting high-achieving students plays an important role in the school context. Hence, one promising support measure within the mixed-ability classroom is differentiated instruction (DI). The current systematic review examined (1) the impact of DI on high-achieving students’ outcomes, (2) to what extent DI is used, (3) how useful teachers and high-achieving students perceive DI, and (4) which barriers and facilitators are encountered in DI’s implementation. Forty-nine studies from 2000 to 2019 were included. Differentiated instruction impacted high-achieving students’ academic achievement and motivational-affective characteristics predominantly positive. However, there was considerable heterogeneity between and within studies. Teachers typically did not use DI for high-achieving students proactively nor on a regular basis. However, teachers and high-achieving students perceived DI as valuable for encouraging high-achieving students. The barriers found might help to explain discrepancies between the extent of usage and the perceived utility, whereas the identified facilitators suggest how to overcome these barriers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.