2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivation in a computer-supported collaborative learning scenario and its impact on learning activities and knowledge acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(82 reference statements)
5
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However these collaboration forums benefit self-motivated learners. Schoor & Bannert (2011) confirms that, "collaborative learning leads to greater skills acquisition for less self-efficacious participants" (p. 561).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However these collaboration forums benefit self-motivated learners. Schoor & Bannert (2011) confirms that, "collaborative learning leads to greater skills acquisition for less self-efficacious participants" (p. 561).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These include: lack of motivation which leads to higher drop-out rates in online distance education courses as reported in Schoor & Bannert (2011), reduced quality of access to socioeconomic marginalization of learners (Mills, 2010), difficulty to develop knowledge through these learning opportunities especially for students (Moos et al, 2009), anonymity of participants which leads to decreased self-awareness through deinviduation and could be a security threat (Ainsworth et al, 2011), less satisfaction and frustration due to limited skill and noise in communication and collaboration processes (Shpigelman, Weiss & Reiter, 2009). All these challenges relate to the threats and weaknesses given during interviews presented in Table 1 & Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has analyzed various motivational factors in collaborative learning (Jarvela, Volet, & Jarvenoja, 2010) and, specifically, in CSCL, such as goal orientations, expectancy and value components (e.g. Schoor & Bannert, 2011), intrinsic and extrinsic peer motivation (e.g. Kong, Kwok, & Fang, 2012), group composition and self-efficacy (Wang & Lin, 2007), co-regulation of learning (e.g.…”
Section: Collaborative Learning and Csclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of social interaction determines success or failure of knowledge management, which is why employees must remain with positive attitudes given that this behavior develops a natural vision to acquire, use, share, and exchange knowledge without sensing that they are work requirements [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].…”
Section: Organizational Values Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%