Motivation, expectations and understanding of patients and their parents seeking orthodontic treatment in specialist practice

Abstract

Objectives: To determine patient and parent/guardian motivation, expectation and understanding of orthodontic treatment. Design: A self-completion questionnaire survey of new patients referred for orthodontic assessment. Setting: Specialist practices in Surrey and Berkshire (United Kingdom). Participants: A total of 500 questionnaires were issued (250 were issued to patients and 250 to parents). Methods: The survey was based on a self-completed questionnaire which was issued at the assessment appointment. Both questionnaires were adapted and extended from originally validated questionnaires previously used in a hospital setting. Patients and parents were asked to complete separate anonymous questionnaires. The patient questionnaire consisted of 24 closed-ended questions divided into three domains: motivation; understanding; and expectation of orthodontic treatment. The parent questionnaire consisted of 13 questions covering the same three domains Results: The response rate for the patient and parent questionnaires was 95% and 91%, respectively. Forty-seven percent of the patients were aged 11-13 years. In 77% of cases, the referral was initiated by their dentist. Only 3% of patients thought there was nothing wrong with their teeth. There was a poor understanding of what a retainer is and for how long patients are expected to use it. Conclusions: Referral for orthodontic treatment was initiated by the patients' general dental practitioner in the majority of the cases. The anticipation of improved dental appearance was a prime motivating factor. Participants had realistic expectations and there was a good acceptance of appliances and dental extractions for orthodontic treatment. Nevertheless, both patients and parents/guardians were less well informed on the nature and duration of orthodontic retention. Keywords motivation, expectations, orthodontic treatment, patients, parents, quality of life and orthodontics, health services and quality of life aspects, psychological aspects of orthodontics Date

The effect of social media on patient acceptance of temporary anchorage devices:

“…36 UK patients sought an esthetic orthodontic improvement rather than a functional or combined esthetic and functional improvement, also seen in a previous report. 37 The Brazilian sample placed more importance on functional improvement, echoing previous findings. 38 This result may have been influenced by only private UK patients being investigated.…”

Self-Esteem and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life within a Cleft Lip and/or Palate Population: A Prospective Cohort Study

“…It is important to note that this assessment was not based on a validated tool. This was an intended decision, aimed to avoid results being influenced by patients having to answer many different and extensive questionnaires [ 32 ]. We found the cleft group to be more motivated than the control group, which could be related to more negative self-perceived aesthetics [ 33 ].…”

Role of Parents in Motivating Children for Orthodontic Treatment; A Cross-Sectional Study Done in Riyadh

“…In comparison, the majority (57%) said it would improve their child's smile, 64% said that it would make tooth brushing easier, 63% said that it would improve their child's bite, and 70% said that it would boost their child's self-esteem and confidence. One-fifth thought therapy would take between one and two years, with the remaining one-fifth stating that it would take less than one year [10].…”