DOI: 10.18297/etd/1118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivation and attitude of preservice elementary teachers toward mathematics : is rural revevant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Butler (2007) reported that there was not a significant relation between teaching competence and teachers' goal orientations. Learning goal orientations and performanceavoidance goal orientation of primary school pre-service teachers were stronger than their performanceapproach orientations (Perry, 2007). In this study, similar to academic self-efficacy, significant relations between goal orientations and teacher efficacy were reported except for performance-approach orientation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, Butler (2007) reported that there was not a significant relation between teaching competence and teachers' goal orientations. Learning goal orientations and performanceavoidance goal orientation of primary school pre-service teachers were stronger than their performanceapproach orientations (Perry, 2007). In this study, similar to academic self-efficacy, significant relations between goal orientations and teacher efficacy were reported except for performance-approach orientation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In the current study, fifteen percent of the variance of academic achievement (GPA) of pre-service teachers was explained by learning goal orientations, academic self-efficacy and teacher sense of efficacy for instructional strategies. In formal education, due to the accumulation of the knowledge on professional issues (Beghetto, 2007) academic and teacher self-efficacy enhance and pre-service teachers adopt learning goals compare to performance goals (Perry, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%