2006
DOI: 10.1080/02702710600848023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivating Struggling Readers in an Era of Mandated Instructional Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps these simple scaffolds were effective because they were easy for the tutors to use with students they did not know well and helped them build a positive and engaging motivational environment for reading challenging texts. These findings support calls for attention to motivational elements in interactional scaffolding (Belland, Kim, & Hannafin, 2013), within instructional reading curricula (Margolis & McCabe, 2006), and in complex text instruction (Sanden, 2014). Although the Common Core's text complexity standards do not address motivational scaffolding, our results suggest instruction of Common Core-style complex texts should consider motivational scaffolding to help build and sustain engagement with those texts.…”
Section: Maintaining Student Engagement Through Motivational Scaffoldingsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Perhaps these simple scaffolds were effective because they were easy for the tutors to use with students they did not know well and helped them build a positive and engaging motivational environment for reading challenging texts. These findings support calls for attention to motivational elements in interactional scaffolding (Belland, Kim, & Hannafin, 2013), within instructional reading curricula (Margolis & McCabe, 2006), and in complex text instruction (Sanden, 2014). Although the Common Core's text complexity standards do not address motivational scaffolding, our results suggest instruction of Common Core-style complex texts should consider motivational scaffolding to help build and sustain engagement with those texts.…”
Section: Maintaining Student Engagement Through Motivational Scaffoldingsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Techniques such as planning activities at an appropriate level of difficulty, praising effort, emphasizing positive outcomes (Margolis and McCabe 2006), presenting peer and teacher models (both coping and mastery models), teaching students to set goals, providing opportunities for self-evaluation (Schunk 2003), teaching various learning strategies, and emphasizing learning rather than performance in assessment (Walker 2003) have been identified as means to increase students' academic self-efficacy. Research shows that students' goal orientation is often dependent on the goals set by others and can be manipulated based on a number of factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In school settings such techniques have been found to increase children’s academic performance [51,52]. It is possible therefore that these techniques will also be effective for promoting other behaviors in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%