2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00611.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivating Employees in a New Governance Era: The Performance Paradigm Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
182
2
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
182
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As Perry, Engbers and Jun (2009) posit, support for PBP is theoretically grounded in expectancy theory (Pearce and Perry 1983) and reinforcement theory (Perry, Mesch, and Paarlberg, 2006). Expectancy theory is predicated on a belief that individuals will exert effort if they expect it will result in an outcome that they value (Van Eerde and Thierry, 1996).…”
Section: Concept Of Motivation and Performance Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Perry, Engbers and Jun (2009) posit, support for PBP is theoretically grounded in expectancy theory (Pearce and Perry 1983) and reinforcement theory (Perry, Mesch, and Paarlberg, 2006). Expectancy theory is predicated on a belief that individuals will exert effort if they expect it will result in an outcome that they value (Van Eerde and Thierry, 1996).…”
Section: Concept Of Motivation and Performance Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinforcement theory posits a direct relationship between a desired target behaviour (e.g., performance) and its consequences (e.g., pay). It suggests that pay can be used to create consequences for desired behaviours, such as high performance that will reinforce the behaviours (Perry, Mesch, and Paarlberg 2006).…”
Section: Concept Of Motivation and Performance Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through for instance transformational leadership styles (Bellé 2014) and communicating the prosocial impact , perceptions of SIP can be enhanced. Most importantly, through good job design, providing interesting, meaningful jobs, agencies can create optimal circumstances for their public service motivated employees (Hackman & Oldham 1976;Perry et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved through smart job design, leadership and communication (Paarlberg et al 2008;Perry et al 2006). Such practices could include ensuring contact with beneficiaries or describing the goals of the job in terms of public values.…”
Section: Public Service Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%