“…Existing methods for evaluating complex cell morphologies, like those of microglia, have often relied on manual scoring, which results in subjective and inherently biased data [ 29 , 30 ]. However, other groups have recognized the need for unbiased approaches and as such, have developed standardized methods, such as quantifying 2D (surface area) & 3D (volumetric) characteristics [ [31] , [32] , [33] ], measuring total length and branching complexity of microglial processes [ 34 , 35 ], or clustering microglia into distinct phenotypic subtypes based on expression of various biomarkers [ 36 , 37 ]. The major limitations with these approaches, however, is that some are only partially automated and rely on manual cell selection and/or tracing [ 29 , 30 ], they require high magnification & high-resolution images, which results in low-to medium-throughput analyses [ 32 , 34 , 36 ], and most studies report either fluorescent [ 35 , 36 ] or chromogen [ 38 ] detection methods, but no published method demonstrates the versatility of their tool to analyze morphologies labeled using both detection methods.…”