2018
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2810449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motionlets Matching With Adaptive Kernels for 3-D Indian Sign Language Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is first time a 2D skeletal sign language video data is being used for multi view recognition. The 2D skeletal videos are generated for 3D sign language data captured with 3D motion capture technology [6,7]…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is first time a 2D skeletal sign language video data is being used for multi view recognition. The 2D skeletal videos are generated for 3D sign language data captured with 3D motion capture technology [6,7]…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the 3D sensors such as Kinect [4], leap motion [5] and motion capture [6] has bettered the SLR results in the past decade. However, only motion capture had the capability to model near perfect biomechanics of human body to recreate sign language 3D data [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization to articulate sign language gestures in different parts of the body as three-dimensional movements has been presented [12].In [13] Rajam et al proposed recognizition of South Indian Sign Language gestures by considering 32 number of gestures with an obtained accuracy of 98.12%. In [14], the work has been performed by Deora et al to recognize ISL gesture by considering both hand and overlapping hand.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features such as 3D graph joint trajectory locations [12] and joint relative distances [13] are used for human motion analysis. The features form human actions are classified using support vector machine [14], convolutional Neural Networks [15], Dynamic Time Warping [16], weighted graph matching [17] and Histogram [18]. However, JRD's and RRJRD's based descriptors for human action recognition were successfully used with graph kernel matching in [13] [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%