Motion Sickness in Virtual Reality: An Empirical Evaluation

Abstract

Due to rapid growth in Virtual Reality (VR) technology, the industry of VR is expected to grow around $26.89 billion by 2022. However, with its extensive growth and immersive inclusion in human life, health-related issues are reported including, but not limited to nauseated feeling, vomiting, dizziness and cold sweats. These issues introduce a well-known side effect termed as motion sickness in VR users. Consequently, motion sickness limits the VR community in the full adaptation of this immersive technology. Since there is no lack of literature investigating motion sickness caused by VR, yet researches on the effect of VR on human's physiology is still in its infancy. This study presents novel findings, by comparing different factors such as gender, motion sickness experience, 3D games experience and VR experience. Furthermore, it reports the impact of concerning factors in a within-subjects design (46 participants participated in an experiment) under different virtual environment genres. The key findings of this article report that there is a significant difference in the amount of motion sickness when shifting from pleasant to the horror genre of the environment and having a strong dependence on gender. Moreover, the type of virtual environment is an essential factor that has a notable effect on the user's blood pressure, blood sugar and heart rate. However, past experiences with motion sickness and 3D games show no significant impact on the user's level of motion sickness.

Motion sickness and sense of presence in a virtual reality environment developed for manual wheelchair users, with three different approaches

“…To figure out what factors influence motion sickness in VR, Chattha et al [ 9 ] conducted an experiment with 46 participants. The VR system used in this study was the Oculus Rift DK2.…”

E3XR: An Analytical Framework for Ethical, Educational and Eudaimonic XR Design

“…Unintended consequences may occur from a poor design that does not account for personal safety and minimize risk. These may include physiological effects such as visual fatigue (Iskander et al, 2018) and motion sickness (Chattha et al, 2020), which studies have shown to affect women more than men (e.g., Kim et al, 2018); or the introduction of physical danger that may even turn out to be life threatening. For instance, distraction or impaired attention may create physical danger for an AR game in which players drive automobiles while playing the game (Ayers et al, 2016), walk around one's city, or are even mistook as threats by uninformed observers.…”

Study of Interaction Methods in Virtual Electrician Training

“…The assessment survey questionnaire was completed after the given participant finished work on a given day. The cyber sickness survey was completed on a similar basis, except that if clear symptoms [27] occurred while using the application, the test would be discontinued at the participant's request and the questionnaire completed. If there were no clear symptoms or signals from the participant, both questionnaires were completed at the end of the workday.…”