The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574707003980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion planning for multiple non-holonomic robots: a geometric approach

Abstract: In this paper, a geometrical approach is developed to generate simultaneously optimal (or near-optimal) smooth paths for a set of non-holonomic robots, moving only forward in a 2D environment cluttered with static and moving obstacles. The robots environment is represented by a 3D geometric entity called Bump-Surface, which is embedded in a 4D Euclidean space. The multi-motion planning problem (MMPP) is resolved by simultaneously finding the paths for the set of robots represented by monoparametric smooth C 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-robot optimal motion planning is even more computationally challenging, because the worst-case computational complexity exponentially grows as the robot number. Current multi-robot motion planning mainly falls into three categories: centralized planning [5] [6], decoupled planning [7] [8] and priority planning [9] [10]. Noticeably, none of these multirobot motion planners are able to guarantee the optimality of returned solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-robot optimal motion planning is even more computationally challenging, because the worst-case computational complexity exponentially grows as the robot number. Current multi-robot motion planning mainly falls into three categories: centralized planning [5] [6], decoupled planning [7] [8] and priority planning [9] [10]. Noticeably, none of these multirobot motion planners are able to guarantee the optimality of returned solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al 10 presented an optimal motion planning strategy that generates minimum-time, first-derivative-smooth paths for a mobile robot. Finally, Xidias and Aspragathos 26 developed a geometrical approach for generating simultaneously optimal smooth paths for a set of non-holonomic robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the multi-robot open-loop motion planning, the approaches mainly fall into three categories: centralized planning in; e.g., [24], [28], decoupled planning in; e.g., [15], [26] and priority planning in; e.g., [9], [12]. Centralized planning is complete but computationally expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%