2015
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion of the femoral condyles in flexion and extension during a continuous lunge

Abstract: Numerous studies have reported on in-vivo posterior femoral condyle translations during various activities of the knee. However, no data has been reported on the knee motion during a continuous flexion-extension cycle. Further, few studies have investigated the gender variations on the knee kinematics. This study quantitatively determined femoral condylar motion of 10 male and 10 female knees during a continuous weightbearing flexion-extension cycle using two-dimensional to three-dimensional fluoroscopic track… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(86 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic images of the knee during the single-legged lunge were captured using a fluoroscopic imaging system (Philips, WA, USA) at a frame rate of 30 Hz following a published protocol (Feng et al, 2015). Participants were asked to stand with feet apart at shoulder width and toes forward without any supporting devices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dynamic images of the knee during the single-legged lunge were captured using a fluoroscopic imaging system (Philips, WA, USA) at a frame rate of 30 Hz following a published protocol (Feng et al, 2015). Participants were asked to stand with feet apart at shoulder width and toes forward without any supporting devices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D CT-based knee model was also imported into the software and manipulated in 6 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) until the projections of the model matched the outlined silhouettes of the bones captured on the fluoroscopic images. Therefore, the dynamic knee motion was represented by a series of 3D knee models along the flexion path (Feng et al, 2015; Zhu and Li, 2012). Spline interpolations with 5° flexion increments were used to resample the knee kinematics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of kinematics, human knee is a hinged system with 6 degreesof-freedom (DOFs), enabling combined movements not depending on rotation and translation, with flexionextension being the key movement. [33][34][35] The remaining DOFs are the upper/lower translations, medial/lateral translation, and internal/external rotations as abduction/adduction. Due to the use of a two-dimensional numerical model, only two movements can be considered such as the static standing position and the passive extension-flexion movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross point of the projection lines of two adjacent postures was defined as the center of rotation of the intervertebral segment (Dennis et al, 2005; Feng et al, 2015; Johal et al, 2005; Komistek et al, 2003; Moro-oka et al, 2008) (Fig. 2a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%