2006
DOI: 10.1130/g22463.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion of Nubia relative to Antarctica since 11 Ma: Implications for Nubia-Somalia, Pacific–North America, and India-Eurasia motion

Abstract: Recent estimates of the rotation between Nubia and Somalia have resulted in disparate poles of rotation for the motion since 3.16 Ma (southwest of South Africa) compared with that since 11.03 Ma (near the east tip of Brazil). Here we use magnetic anomaly profiles unavailable in prior Nubia-Antarctica motion studies to significantly revise the estimate of the rotation between Nubia and Antarctica since 11.03 Ma. We use this newly estimated rotation to construct revised estimates of Nubia-Somalia, Pacific-North … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Figure 7, the velocities over SOM are estimated relative to the Nubian plate. Prawirodirdjo and Bock, 2004;McCaffrey, 2005;Calais et al, 2006b;Royer et al, 2006;Socquet et al, 2006;HornerJohnson et al, 2007]. For the pairs NAM-PAC, NAZ-SAM, NUB-SOM, and EUR-IND, most GPS estimates of the pole position agree with the geologic pole at a 95% confidence level.…”
Section: Relative Plate Rotation Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast to Figure 7, the velocities over SOM are estimated relative to the Nubian plate. Prawirodirdjo and Bock, 2004;McCaffrey, 2005;Calais et al, 2006b;Royer et al, 2006;Socquet et al, 2006;HornerJohnson et al, 2007]. For the pairs NAM-PAC, NAZ-SAM, NUB-SOM, and EUR-IND, most GPS estimates of the pole position agree with the geologic pole at a 95% confidence level.…”
Section: Relative Plate Rotation Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While there is much higher resolution data available for part of the latter plate circuit, there is also considerable uncertainty in terms of constraints as to the magnitude of crustal extension in the East-African Rift System. For example our investigation of the various reconstructions that rotate India relative to Somalia (e.g., Chu and Gordon, 1999;Horner-Johnson et al, 2007;Lemaux et al, 2002;Royer et al, 2006) highlighted that there was contradiction between what these models proposed for the timing and geometry of crustal extension in the East-African Rift System (11-0 Ma), compared to field observations that suggest crustal extension began at ∼32 Ma (Joffe and Garfunkel, 1987). This discrepancy indicates that the problem in the India-Somalia plate circuit cannot simply be resolved, e.g., by changing the age of the 11 Ma Euler pole to 32 Ma.…”
Section: Towards An Integrated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kendall et al, 2005;2006;Bastow et al, 2010) show that the MER is one of the most anisotropic regions worldwide, with SKS splitting delay times as high as~3 s. Intriguingly, the change in orientation of fast SKS waves from the plateau regions to the MER mirrors a shift from N130°E-directed extension to N110°E-directed extension at~2 Ma, when crustal strain localized towards the volcanically active Wonji Fault Belt (WFB) (e.g. Wolfenden et al, 2004), though recent studies have questioned such polyphase deformation (Corti, 2008) based upon revised kinematic models for Nubia-Somalia plate motion (Royer et al, 2006). Study of seismic anisotropy via combined analysis of body and surface waves shows that elongate melt inclusions (dikes and veins) characterise the Ethiopian lithosphere from~20 km to at least 50 km depth beneath the MER (Bastow et al, 2010).…”
Section: Geophysical Evidence Of Mer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%