2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2014.0538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion-corrected echo decorrelation imaging of in vivo focused and bulk ultrasound ablation in a rabbit liver cancer model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an appropriate choice of echo decorrelation threshold can provide high prediction specificity, which is appropriate for ablation control using echo decorrelation imaging as discussed below. Prediction performance by echo decorrelation was generally better than prediction by IBS, with significantly higher AUC values for focused exposures and all exposures combined in liver tissue, consistent with previous observations (Fosnight et al 2014; Mast et al 2008; Subramanian et al 2014). AUC values for ablation prediction by IBS were not significantly higher than those for echo decorrelation in any of the cases examined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, an appropriate choice of echo decorrelation threshold can provide high prediction specificity, which is appropriate for ablation control using echo decorrelation imaging as discussed below. Prediction performance by echo decorrelation was generally better than prediction by IBS, with significantly higher AUC values for focused exposures and all exposures combined in liver tissue, consistent with previous observations (Fosnight et al 2014; Mast et al 2008; Subramanian et al 2014). AUC values for ablation prediction by IBS were not significantly higher than those for echo decorrelation in any of the cases examined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(1) is normalized by the inter-frame time τ to define the echo decorrelation map per millisecond (Fosnight et al, 2017) and by the average of β 2 ( y , z , t ) and β2¯ to reduce decorrelation artifacts in hypoechoic and hyperechoic regions respectively (Mast et al, 2008). More detailed derivation and analysis of echo decorrelation imaging is given elsewhere (Mast et al, 2008; Subramanian et al, 2014; Fosnight et al, 2014, 2017; Hooi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, series of uncontrolled HIFU ablation trials (5.0 MHz, 24% duty cycle) were also performed. The maximum number of uncontrolled therapy cycles was selected to be 9, corresponding to the number previously found sufficient to ensure in vivo ablation of both rabbit liver and VX2 tumor (Fosnight et al, 2017, 2014). A total of 10 uncontrolled trials were performed using this maximum duration (total time 26.1 s for 9 cycles).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation