Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453)
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2003.1248799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion control for robust landing of acrobat robot (SMB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, ZMP and FRI are not suitable for postural stability analysis when the foot is already rotated. Stability considerations with foot rotation for the activities like back-handspring, handstand, and somersault are reported in [23] and [24], which are confined to gait generation and control strategies. In the landing phase of jumping gaits, the biped postures may be either with foot rotation or with the foot being flat on the ground (modeled by foot compliance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ZMP and FRI are not suitable for postural stability analysis when the foot is already rotated. Stability considerations with foot rotation for the activities like back-handspring, handstand, and somersault are reported in [23] and [24], which are confined to gait generation and control strategies. In the landing phase of jumping gaits, the biped postures may be either with foot rotation or with the foot being flat on the ground (modeled by foot compliance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically for the generation of acrobatic motion with a horizontal bar, Sadahiro realized taking off from the horizontal bar and somersault in the air [3], [4] and Kishikawa realized landing control on tip toe [5]. Though the landing control is realized using standing on tip toe, region of stabilized posture is not so large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%