2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2010.5495553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion artifact cancellation to obtain heart sounds from a single chest-worn accelerometer

Abstract: This paper presents a method of extracting primary heart sound signals from chest-worn accelerometer data in the presence of motion artifacts. The proposed method outperforms noise removal techniques such as wavelet denoising and adaptive filtering. Results from six subjects show a primary heart signal detection rate of 99.36% with a false positive rate of 1.3%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data show that the heartbeat signals are contaminated by the motion artifact, and the features and graphs of the heartbeat signals cannot be identified during the walking period. Figure 9b,c show the extracted heartbeat signals using Savitzky Golay-based polynomial smoothing [14] and ARLSF. Features and graphs of heartbeat signals are not clear from 120 s to 300 s in Figure 9b.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data show that the heartbeat signals are contaminated by the motion artifact, and the features and graphs of the heartbeat signals cannot be identified during the walking period. Figure 9b,c show the extracted heartbeat signals using Savitzky Golay-based polynomial smoothing [14] and ARLSF. Features and graphs of heartbeat signals are not clear from 120 s to 300 s in Figure 9b.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.b illustrates the processed SCG signal, which is achieved after the low-pass filtering and NLMS adaptive filtering steps performed on the acceleration data. For comparison purposes, the result of a Savitzky Golay smoothing filter designed in [13] is demonstrated in Fig. 3.c and the reference ECG signal is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their threshold for choosing a proper segment is that the standard deviation of the measurement should be smaller than 4 mg (milli-gravity). Pandia et al implemented a polynomial smoothing filter to cancel motion artifacts in walking subjects and amplify the peak of the heart sound with the trade-off of distorting the acceleration waveform [13]. This method has successfully improved the heartbeat detection rate but the exact SCG graph from the moving segments could not be recovered.…”
Section: Introduction Eismocardiogram (Scg)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More studies are needed that compare different filtering methods in clinical and ambulatory settings. [26,36,38,41,45,46,55,[58][59][60][61][62][63]67,71,75,76,[78][79][80]82,93] Adaptive filtering Motion artefact removal [88,95] Averaging theory Motion artefact removal [101] Comb filtering Removing respiration noise from radar signal [50] Empirical mode decomposition Baseline wandering, breathing and body movement artefact removal [76,94,95] Independent component analysis Motion artefact removal [102] Median filtering [96] Morphological filtering [95] Polynomial smoothing Motion artefact removal [103] Savitzky-Golay filtering Motion artefact removal [83,103] Wavelet denoising Segmentation of HSs and SCG [64,95,96] Wiener filtering [94] 2.…”
Section: Noise Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%